To: Louis Foxwell
you over look the one salient fact.......
there is no one else besides Ryan with enough support to be elected
6 posted on
10/26/2015 5:26:19 AM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump)
To: bert
If there aren't enough RINOs to elect Ryan and there aren't enough RINOs willing to cross over and elect Pelosi (the de facto RINO fall back position once the primary filing deadlines pass) then there must enough votes to elect some conservative. I'd love Gohmert to run, but will settle for taking his advice. He says that as much as we've had problems with the individual leaders the underlying problem is system gives the leadership too much power. It needs to be reorganized to give more power to individual representatives and bottom up coalitions rather than top down control. Such change would comport with conservative principles and tend to produce more conservative outcomes long term. Louis favors the man who's done such change before, Daniel Webster. He's not been a perfect Conservative, although he defeated a perfect Liberal to take office, but he's not part of the current cartel. And if he can make these changes the conservative caucus would drive the action rather than the Speaker.
9 posted on
10/26/2015 6:07:29 AM PDT by
JohnBovenmyer
(Obama been Liberal. Hope Change)
To: bert
So the speakership is not a contestable position but is a popularity contest.
11 posted on
10/26/2015 6:41:00 AM PDT by
Louis Foxwell
(This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
To: bert
It would be better to simply not have a Speaker than to accede to a Boehner with more drive. With Ryan as with Boehner the Democrats actually run the House and the Speakership is a Democrat Party preserve, indirectly with a puppet nominal Republican.
13 posted on
10/26/2015 6:56:27 AM PDT by
arthurus
(Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson