Posted on 10/24/2015 8:15:47 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
That in itself is the hostile action that would start it.
I don’t care. Like 0bama, Holder, Hillary, Lerner and the rest I don’t give a rip what the law says.
There was a time when most of us would never believe things could get that bad.
The more I see everyday with the lawlessness running rampant...
It is very possible to me that they might try and do something like that.
Our govt arms terrorists for heaven’s sake. They’ve killed a lot of people just trying to cover things up.
At this point, I really wouldn’t put anything past them.
Our govt is straight up evil and getting worse by the day.
CA passed the same kind of law about 20 years ago, and the courts never overturned it. Not justifying it, just saying it’s not exactly a shocking development. Have to see what SCOTUS says, who knows? Depends what side of the bed Kennedy and Roberts get up on.
Bring it on, jackasses! Oh, PLEASE DO! I can barely contain my enthusiasm for you fools to make the attempt. I simply relish the thought of dispatching, with extreme prejudice, tyrants - especially those who are fond of wearing black robes.
Come on, let’s get this game on. I’ll bet I can reduce each of you to room temperature before you even realize what’s happening.
MOLON LABE!
From your lips to God’s ears sir.
That will likely be all the new imports from the ME and Mexico. Ole!
You can thank Heller for that. It simultaneously upheld the individual RKBA while saying that there could be "reasonable restrictions" or some such. Obviously, "reasonable restrictions" is a hole through which a Mack truck could pass.
We're gonna need a bigger cage.
PING!
“I don’t think people are going to be stuffed into black marias like during Stalin’s time.”
2nd Amendment supporters are using a losing strategy when they only act in defense of the 2nd Amendment. The supporters of the 2nd Amendment must follow the adage, “The best defense is a good offense,” if they expect to preserve their 2nd Amendment rights. Rather than wait for a Leftist corrupted legislature and judiciary to defy the 2nd Amendment and its principles recognizing the inherent Human right to keep and bear arms in defense of the person and the Constitutional Republic, they can take the legislative and judicial offensive against those public officials who would use the color of law to abridge and/or extinguish such civil rights. Legislation can make it a felony to advocate or act to subvert the 2nd Amendment civil rights; and such legislation can specify the mandatory voiding of all such subversive executive, judicial, and legislative acts against the 2nd Amendment civil rights. Such efforts to abridge or extinguish the 2nd Amendment civil rights need to be treated as felonious efforts to overthrow the sovereignty of U.S. Citizens.
Bump
This government is bringing and letting in millions of people from other countries and the ME who know how to and have used weapons of various types. THEY will acquire and use them against us by any means possible. The present so-called ‘Administration’ may just arm them, as it is doing in the ME.
The ‘normal’ rules no longer apply.
The Supreme Court ruled in support of the Second Amendment some time ago. This is false flagging
Yep. I don’t want my kids to have to do it.
Absolutely.
5.56mm
“You won’t need the second amendment until they try to take it away from you. Jefferson
“If it’s war they want then let it begin here let it begin now”. Captain Johnny Parker Concord Green 1775 as British troops were marching to the armory to sieze the weapons there.
“A people unwilling to use extreme violent force to obtain or preserve their liberty deserves the tyrannts that rule them” I said this some year’s ago here.
You deserve some.
This is New York State business.
Wrong. this is the business of the people, concerning their God-given, UNALIENABLE rights, which precede and supersede all man-made laws and constitutions.
Federal Court just says (rightly, IMO), “It’s none of our business.”
The securing of the God-given, unalienable rights of the people is the reason all legitimate governments exist. Not only is it their "business," it is their very raison d'etre.
Doesn’t mean that they approve of it.
Their approval or disapproval is not optional. The securing of the God-given, unalienable rights of the people is the reason all legitimate governments exist.
Should have been taken up with the NY State Supreme Court.
The securing of the God-given, unalienable rights of the people is the reason all legitimate governments exist. That includes the NY State Supreme Court.
If you want a ‘republican form of government’ this is it in action.
The securing of the God-given, unalienable rights of the people is the reason all legitimate governments exist. That's the first premise of the American republican form of government. Without this principle, the American republican form of government is dead.
If a court rules against our God-given, unalienable rights, that doesn’t change the absolute fact that our rights are God-given and therefore unalienable. The only thing it changes is the legitimacy of the court making the immoral, unconstitutional ruling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.