Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DungeonMaster

One very simple way I’ve found of rocking a lib back on their heels in a “discussion” is to demand the discussion not continue until they define the terms they are using.

>Define “fair” in numbers.
>What would that actually look like and how would you force compliance?


9 posted on 10/21/2015 7:15:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
One very simple way I’ve found of rocking a lib back on their heels in a “discussion” is to demand the discussion not continue until they define the terms they are using.

>Define “fair” in numbers. >What would that actually look like and how would you force compliance?

Yes, back when I could actually get myself to stomach a conversation with a liberal I'd try reason all the time. One thing I tell my kids "We're Republicans! We work with numbers". With libs it's always emotional mantras.

"Thou shall not covet", shows that the liberal mantra is a trick of Satan. The liberal politician absolutely depends on making people covet and it leads right to communism.

10 posted on 10/21/2015 7:19:29 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson