The media ARE controlling the narrative and you don't get it: It's ALL about Trump. There isn't a bit of time by comparison for anybody else. He hardly has to spend a dime to his the word out and hasn't. Why?
I think it's because the fix is in, and Trump has told you so. But the dupes for Donald were so enamored at his faux anger that you couldn't see the boomerang amnesty in his immigration plan. I've posted that content a good many times and NOT ONCE has one of his athletic supporters ever taken on the facts cited in the post. NOT ONCE has one ever explained to me why an employer of hordes of busboys, construction workers, maids, laborers, and groundskeepers doesn't have an interest in such a closet amnesty.
Explain why this is not a realistic likelihood that Trump has NOT addressed. Trump has never explained how he plans to deport (at least) one-out-of-fifteen US residents, or how he's going to get Americans to do those jobs. Not once. Yet the lemmings behind this former Democrat who consulted Bill Clinton just before he announced fall right in line. Why aren't you the least bit suspicious, sufficient to ask "Where's the beef?"
But it isn't only immigration. Try healthcare. When asked about abortion and women's healthcare, he made OUTRAGEOUS and totally unconstitutional promises (in answer to this question at 55:00), yet not a peep from his supporters on this forum when he criticized Bush's refusal to spend a half billion to fund Planned Parenthood:
Oh, but he's changed... not.
If there ever was a "fix is in," it is with Jeb Bush and Rove and the big money PACs that are still holding up his empty suit.
As a final comment, your comment, "I've posted that content a good many times and NOT ONCE has one of his athletic supporters ever taken on the facts cited in the post" is the prime example of the derision, discounting, ridicule and obsessed TDS I'm talking about.
Well we are funding planned parenthood which is apparently is viewed as a constitutional right by the left. PP does not take care of women in a good way.
I imagine that's because, like all other TDS sufferers, you can't tell the difference between facts, and your own speculation about what those facts mean, and how they should be interpreted.
As such, I further imagine no one wishes to take the time to refute specious suppositions before they can even get into a substantive discussion.
I know when *I* run across those who simply will not entertain the idea their evaluation of Trump may be flawed, to the exclusion of any and all "exculpatory" rationales, I usually don't bother wasting my valuable FReeping time with them.