Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usdefensewatch

Hackworth was a blowhard and a hack (no pun intended). He’s the last thing the Army needs right now.


3 posted on 10/20/2015 6:08:12 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Timber Rattler
I thought the guy was a hero.

When I signed into Airborne school years and years ago, there was a photo of him in the S-1 holding all of his Purple Hearts.

Years later, I was at the Army War College. I got to meet men who had served with him in Vietnam. The reports weren't good.

I then met a E-8 who had Hackworth in his unit as a "reporter" during the first Gulf War. He was hardly tough guy his books would have you believe.

4 posted on 10/20/2015 6:20:31 PM PDT by Volunteer (Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler; doc1019

A George S. Patton, Matthew B. Ridgeway, or Curtis LeMay would be nice too.

(I know, LeMay was USAF, but technically, he was US Army Air Corps first...)


7 posted on 10/20/2015 6:23:04 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler
Hackworth was a blowhard and a hack ...

You 'pal' are a f***ing idiot. Hack was one of the Army's most decorated warriors ... he started as an enlisted man and moved up thru the ranks. He distinguished himself as a warrior and a combat leader in Korea & Vietnam. The troops he led would follow him anywhere ... he was a leader who led from the front.

9 posted on 10/20/2015 6:29:50 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler
Hackworth was a blowhard and a hack (no pun intended). He’s the last thing the Army needs right now.

If he said the Vietnam War was unwinnable in 1971, he was full of baloney. Together with the South Vietnamese, we won the war a year and a half later. But then we walked away and left the South Vietnamese to their fate.

13 posted on 10/20/2015 6:38:58 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler

He said the Army didn’t need APCs and could ride on the backs of tanks. A bit of a problem when you get to turbine powered vehicles.


39 posted on 10/21/2015 7:37:52 AM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler

He sure as hell served his country through much more combat exposure than the average blowhard like you and I

He was eccentric

Hell he saw combat and fought back in his 70s in Port au Prince while there covering the story

Not many can say that

No hero is perfect


41 posted on 10/21/2015 7:42:27 AM PDT by wardaddy (The establishment needs destroying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson