Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: afraidfortherepublic

What a pair of big brass ones this b!tch has. No one signed off. Because the policy didn’t prohibit it. The “policy” existed well before she took the job.

Blatantly lying. Even if there is a case where personal emails are used, existing (at the time) federal records keeping laws/regulations/rules/procedures REQUIRES them to be kept safe and archived. Sifting through your old emails is NOT archiving. It is evidence tampering.


11 posted on 10/17/2015 8:50:13 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
What a pair of big brass ones this b!tch has. No one signed off. Because the policy didn’t prohibit it. The “policy” existed well before she took the job.

You have to parse those words.

She's right. The policy didn't prohibit it...federal statutes did.

31 posted on 10/17/2015 11:31:20 AM PDT by seowulf (Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum. Cogito.---Ambrose Bierce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson