To: Borges
She thought he looked suspicious. If he were a suspicious character, as a woman, she would be foolish to engage him in conversation.
She did what she felt was her duty. If he had been a pervert, we would be lauding her.
22 posted on
10/15/2015 2:21:04 PM PDT by
Calpublican
(Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
To: Calpublican
He had taken no pictures that day, his camera proved it. She thought he looked suspicious because he HAD a camera with him. She should have waited and watched him from a distance to see if he was actually taking pictures of children.
She is a busybody and needs to be reprimanded for her actions.
24 posted on
10/15/2015 2:26:58 PM PDT by
Ditter
(God Bless Texas!)
To: Calpublican
A friend of mine who lives across the street from a park noticed a car repeatedly parked on her street and the owner spending a lot of time in the park. She felt very uncomfortable and was concerned for her young sons. We contacted a police officer friend who started watching the guy. It turned out the guy was gay and frequented the park and the men's restroom for sex with strangers. As far as I know he was not a child predator, but I would not have allowed my sons to go into the restroom alone.
I understand the writer's side of the story. However, I also know that it is wise to go with your gut instincts. If you feel creeped out by someone, there is more often than not a good reason for it.
36 posted on
10/15/2015 2:46:48 PM PDT by
Nevadan
To: Calpublican
She thought he was suspiscious. Would she have thought the same if he was a she?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson