Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Another round of the bamster's war on sanity.

I have a suggestion -- stop trying to have government in every conceivable nook and cranny of economic activity. The only thing government has been good at is consistently and regularly proving the Law of Unintended Consequences.

3 posted on 10/10/2015 6:47:41 AM PDT by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: immadashell

Obama thinks it may give his Muslim buddies competition.


7 posted on 10/10/2015 7:29:46 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell
Obama's stance here shouldn't be seen in purely partisan terms. The ban on crude oil exports has been in place since the 1970s, which means it has lived through numerous administrations -- including much of the second Bush administration when the GOP controlled both the House and Senate.

I'm usually a free-market advocate, but there's one compelling reason to keep this oil export ban in place. To me, it makes no sense to allow U.S. producers to sell a natural resource on the open market when the U.S. government is buying that same resource to supply a Strategic Petroleum Reserve. If crude oil is considered a strategic national resource, then it surely can't be expected to be treated the same way as any other commodity.

8 posted on 10/10/2015 7:38:26 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson