Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: U.S. officials conclude Iran deal violates federal law
Fox News ^ | 10/8/15 | James Rosen

Posted on 10/08/2015 5:08:06 PM PDT by Nachum

Some senior U.S. officials involved in the implementation of the Iran nuclear deal have privately concluded that a key sanctions relief provision – a concession to Iran that will open the doors to tens of billions of dollars in U.S.-backed commerce with the Islamic regime – conflicts with existing federal statutes and cannot be implemented without violating those laws, Fox News has learned.

At issue is a passage tucked away in ancillary paperwork attached to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, as the Iran nuclear deal is formally known. Specifically, Section 5.1.2 of Annex II provides that in exchange for Iranian compliance with the terms of the deal, the U.S. “shall…license non-U.S. entities that are owned or controlled by a U.S. person to engage in activities with Iran that are consistent with this JCPOA.”

In short, this means that foreign subsidiaries of U.S. parent companies will, under certain conditions, be allowed to do business with Iran. The problem is that the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act (ITRA), signed into law by President Obama in August 2012, was explicit in closing the so-called “foreign sub” loophole.

Indeed, ITRA also stipulated, in Section 218, that when it comes to doing business with Iran, foreign subsidiaries of U.S. parent firms shall in all cases be treated exactly the same as U.S. firms: namely, what is prohibited for U.S. parent firms has to be prohibited for foreign subsidiaries, and what is allowed for foreign subsidiaries has to be allowed for U.S. parent firms.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: federal; iran; irandeal; iransanctions; law; sanctions; violates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Nachum

You people think I care about law??? Really?

21 posted on 10/08/2015 6:46:44 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah, like hussein gives a sh*t about law..


22 posted on 10/08/2015 6:56:40 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Certified Islamophobe and Microaggressor..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well OSlither and the Congress will just ignore that pesky detail.


23 posted on 10/08/2015 6:57:52 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Lawzz??

Whaat Lawzz??

Whee don’ need no Steeenking Lawzz—we gots Obama!!


24 posted on 10/08/2015 7:15:15 PM PDT by Flintlock (Our soapbox is gone, the ballot box stolen--we're left with the bullet box now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Does anyone believe that “THEY” didn’t know this?


25 posted on 10/08/2015 7:16:42 PM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (1 John 2:22...the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Cruz said exactly this weeks ago.


26 posted on 10/09/2015 8:08:57 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson