The Club for Growth made sense as long as it touted people from outside of K Street, outside the dream box of the GOPe.
Now that it touts folks like Bush and Rubio, of what value is it?
If I wanted GOPe directives I’d tune in to it’s web sites, the RNC, the House and Senate leadership.
Why would I need Club for Growth to be a go-between.
Club for Growth is worthless. I honestly didn’t know this before, because I never followed them that much. They may have been out of sync with my views in the past.
Now it’s obvious. I sure won’t waste my time caring what they think any longer, unless it’s so I can know what not to think.
They were much better under Chris Chocola....they’ve been co-opted under McIntosh...he’s proving himself to be nothing more than a member of the COC/Cheap Labor Exress team. (They’re weak on immigration - I can’t find where they’ve ever put up a fight on strong immigration legislation.) Maybe their idea of *growth* is cheap imported labor?
Very similar to how Heritage Action has turned more moderate under Michael Needham, imo. Very sad to see.
.
>> “Now that it touts folks like Bush and Rubio, of what value is it?” <<
You’re known for nonsense here, but that statement takes the cake. CFG has been taking shots at the very people you listed.
.