“Are you a sede vacante or do you currently hold sede vacante beliefs?”
I am a sedevacantist (one who believes that the chair of Peter lacks a current living successor.)
Anyone who disagrees with supposed authoritative claims of the one who seems to hold the office to the Vicar of Christ is either a heretic or a sedevacantist.
I identify as a sede-vacantist (translated “the chair is empty”) because I do not believe that Jorge Bergoglio licitly holds the office.
St. Robert Bellarmine, a doctor of the church teaches that one cannot be a heretic and pope at the same time.
Because it is quite evident that in spite of saying SOME things that agree with church teaching, nevertheless Jorge teaches heresy frequently and is feared by the flock to be about to change doctrines in highly visible manners, Jorge cannot be a catholic, let alone pope!
Thank you for your honest answer, this will be my last post to you. I will not debate with people that hold your misguided view.
Why do you believe articles coming from Reuters on Catholicism when you would not believe an article that came from them about conservative Republicans?
Thank you for your frank response. Since you do not indicate it, which is the last pope you recognize?