Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Use of e-cigarettes now banned in all national parks
http://www.reviewjournal.com ^ | September 23, 2015 - 10:57amUpdated September 23, 2015 - 11:26pm | By Faith Heaton Jolley

Posted on 09/24/2015 7:07:34 AM PDT by redreno

The National Park Service announced Monday that the use of electronic cigarettes is now banned anywhere tobacco smoking is prohibited in the national parks.

Existing National Park Service policies regarding tobacco smoking were originally issued in 2003 and later revised in 2009, according to a National Park Service internal memo. The new policy was issued in an effort to "protect employees and park visitors from the health hazards and annoyances associated with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, commonly known as secondhand smoke, which is a known human carcinogen," the memo stated.

The use of e-cigarettes will not be allowed in any government owned or leased vehicle including heavy equipment, watercraft or aircraft in the park. Vaping will also be prohibited in national park concession facilities and other buildings.

(Excerpt) Read more at reviewjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: ecigs; esigarerres; govtabuse; overreach; parks; tyranny; vap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Timber Rattler
So they’re effectively banning water vapor?

There is no water in e cigs. Its propylene glycol, glycerin, flavoring, and various concentrations of nicotine.

Any water in that mix makes a distinct POPPING noise which is alarming.

And there is no carbon monoxide or polycyclic hydrocarbons to inhale and those are the most noxious agents in analog cigs. But there is little to no tax revenue from e cigs so they must be banned.

21 posted on 09/24/2015 7:32:32 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“So now, they are forbidding a fake version, or something that doesn’t cause a problem anyway.”

People are quitting cigarettes for e-cigarettes, in droves. So if they don’t demonize the e-cig users too, they lose a scapegoat they spent a long time and a lot of money building up.


22 posted on 09/24/2015 7:39:52 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redreno

No vaping? Does this mean old faithful is put of buisness?


23 posted on 09/24/2015 7:41:14 AM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Hope the holland tunnel gets the makeover I suggested.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno
Headline:

"Use of e-cigarettes now banned in all national parks"

The article's first sentence:

The National Park Service announced Monday that the use of electronic cigarettes is now banned anywhere tobacco smoking is prohibited in the national parks.

Aren't there "smoking area"s in National Parks?
24 posted on 09/24/2015 7:41:38 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

I feel so much safer now. :-)


25 posted on 09/24/2015 7:41:44 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Have to keep the ‘wrong sort’ of people out, right?


26 posted on 09/24/2015 7:44:23 AM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Just my opinion and only worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

e-cigarettes bad, abortion good


27 posted on 09/24/2015 7:51:55 AM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer; All
Liberals and leftist tyrants hate freedom”

This almost goes without saying, is axiomatic...do you want to dispute it? I think it is almost a given.

Now now....smoking/vaping is not freedom, and rules against smoking/vaping is not tyranny.

If smoking/vaping is not a manifestation of personal freedom, what would you call it?

If you want to smoke, then just do it. That is freedom. If you do it around folks who don’t want you to because it bothers them and they toss you out of some place - that, too is freedom.

Let me change this sentence just a little...for example, if I say, 'If you want to be a Christian in a Muslim country, then just do it. That is freedom. If 7th-century barbarians want to behead you for it because it bothers them - that, too is freedom. Would you agree with this? Of course not!

If you want to light up in a room and expect to be protected - THAT is tyranny.

How, exactly, is this tyranny? Smoking is a perfectly legal activity, condoned by all the various states. Are you saying the normal protections afforded all Americans are somehow not applicable to someone indulging in a legal activity?

I think you smokers have it backwards. If you are afraid of breaking the rules, then you are your own problem.

What does this sentence even mean?

NOTE: I personally do NOT smoke.
28 posted on 09/24/2015 8:02:03 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA
e-cigarettes bad, abortion good

Women can do whatever they want with their own bodies, except when they can't.

29 posted on 09/24/2015 8:11:43 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

I once went into a restaurant in Kansas. It had two sections, one nonsmoking and another smoking.
The two sections were separate rooms. I walked through the nonsmoking section to get to the door of the smoking section. The smoking section had a ventilation system independent of any other part of the restaurant.

The place wasn’t crowded, only 6 or 8 people in the nonsmoking section. There were about 16 or so people in the smoking section.

My food had just arrived when a woman sat down and immediately began bitching and complaining about the smoke and smokers.
She continued to complain the entire time I was there.

You remind me of that woman.

Have a nice day.


30 posted on 09/24/2015 8:24:14 AM PDT by oldvirginian (I stand with George Mason: the people first, the states second, the federal government last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: redreno
Good thing the government does banned important things like guns on National Parks!!!! , ..... what's that.... really?... take that back
31 posted on 09/24/2015 8:27:37 AM PDT by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Smoking represents some sort of liberty thing to the government with people doing the thing that government has tole them they shouldn’t. Therefore everything that looks like smoking must be ruthlessly suppressed. Soon chewing on a pencil must be banned on all federal and most city property.


32 posted on 09/24/2015 8:28:11 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Than you support a bar being able to put a sign on the door saying “We Allow Smoking in This Establishment”? Then you are free to enter or not of your own choice.


33 posted on 09/24/2015 8:29:17 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame enobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: redreno
Someone better tell Mother Gaia that she's violating Federal Law.


34 posted on 09/24/2015 8:34:54 AM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“Second hand smoke doesn’t even cause cancer. They played with the stats here to suit their agenda. Even the WHO from the UN doesn’t call it a carcinogen.

So now, they are forbidding a fake version, or something that doesn’t cause a problem anyway.”
__________

Precisely. Additionally, the govt fears loss of revenue if people switch from cigarettes to e-cigs. So they are using the same lie to muscle e-cig makers they way they muscled “Big tobacco”. Heck, if the govt wanted to stop citizens from dying, they would ban tobacco outright. Nope, it’s a false argument to make money...”It might kill you, but give me 25 cents a smoke and I’ll let you”


35 posted on 09/24/2015 9:07:40 AM PDT by LucienCA13 (sorry if you are microaggrieved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

now wait a minute,didn’t second hand smoke kill off all the dinosaurs?


36 posted on 09/24/2015 10:29:34 AM PDT by old gringo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA

You could probably even get an abortion in a national park.


37 posted on 09/24/2015 11:02:14 AM PDT by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA
From the article:

"Outdoor smoking bans in parks can at least somewhat be justified by the risk of fires, but vapor products pose no more of a fire risk than a cellphone battery," Conley told U.S. News. "This behavior is shameful and any enforcement of the ban will constitute a great misuse of government resources. The National Park Service should leave ex-smokers alone and let them camp and hike in peace."

Amen.

38 posted on 09/24/2015 11:05:26 AM PDT by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Can’t. Doesn’t exist.


39 posted on 09/24/2015 11:05:58 AM PDT by oldsicilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Marijuana smoke, by contrast, is not only tolerated but welcomed.


40 posted on 09/24/2015 2:03:55 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson