Okay sea lawyer, how would YOU go about it? You have no idea, do you? And don’t give me any BS about congress, courts, etc. Because if you do, you’re just another same-old-same-old hack who is part of the problem.
So you don't care about the Constitution. I see. You call yourself an American too I'd bet.
Okay sea lawyer, how would YOU go about it? You have no idea, do you?
The bill currently authorized only funds 700 miles of fencing. It's a start, but not nearly enough. We got that through Congress, so in this climate a bill to finish it should not be nearly so difficult. In that bill, make it clear the courts have no jurisdiction over its construction. That's step two.
Step one is what I've been talking about for years on this forum: A bounty system for their arrest and detainment under a Congressional letter of marque. It beats e-Verify in that it doesn't give FedGov control over whether or not you can work.
The same tool can be used to root out Islamic terrorists very quickly.
The President can post the names, nationalities, entry points, entry dates, last known addresses, and dates of expiry on all legal aliens on a web site. Those who overstay those limits would then be fair game under the bounty system.
That's what I would do. It's legal and doesn't abet institutional dictatorship, unlike your preferences.
As part of it, the government must institute an orderly process for assuring that the enforcers understand the law. Putting up web sites with educational materials and tests by which to qualify for the program would meet that test. Thus turning the public into law enforcement finally gets the public to confront the maze of laws, court precedents, and union contracts governing "professional" (unionized) law enforcement. They'll be much more likely to vote for representatives who will simplify those laws and rein in the courts. The exclusionary rule would be at the top of my list.