Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Really? Can’t wait?
Even when it is IN THEIR MODELS that if the USA went back to a stone-age energy usage model we’d decrease the temperature rise by 2 hundredths of a degree?


79 posted on 09/23/2015 10:39:20 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

And that was over a 100 years, wasn’t it?


81 posted on 09/23/2015 10:40:06 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: MrB
I keep this link handy, whenever there is a Global Warming thread going on on Facebook. I love to post what Rush says (without saying it's from him, since people see his name and won't read), but because he's such a genius when he puts things together, I like that most people stop responding to me, after I post it.

There isn't anything, we're not close to replacing oil, not even close.  It's going to be, I don't know how long it's gonna be, but to these people oil is the modern evil. There's no thinking.  All of this is political.  They never address the fact that there's no evidence. They never address that the only concern for any of this is predictions in computer models. 

Let me ask you, if you're watching TV tonight, and your local weatherman told you what the weather was gonna be 25 years from today, would you believe it?  No!  So why do people believe what a computer model says is gonna be the climate all over the world 25 years from now?  And the only way some people could be forced to believe it is if they politicize it and tailor the message to already existing political sensibilities and opinions. And then get people in groups that liberals happen to be approve of, like world bodies like the UN or the IPCC or the National Academy of Sciences, every corrupt liberal interest group you can, get them endorsing the idea, and bammo, you turn it into a political issue, and it is unequivocally true. 

You leave it as a science issue and it doesn't exist, it falls apart, there isn't any evidence whatsoever.  And of course my big question that nobody, no liberal has ever called here to try to explain to me, and the invitation's there every day, would somebody please explain to me how you know that the climate at this moment is what is natural, normal, was intended by God, or Gaia, or whoever.  If you can explain that to me, then maybe we can talk about why any change from what it is now is a crisis.  But why, who says, how do you know that whatever the climate's doing now is what is normal?  Why is this the baseline? 

And then after you explain that, you can tell me what caused any of the ice ages.  And then after you explain that to me, you can then tell me why those ice ages ended, permitting us to live.  And then after you explain that, I'll give you something else I'm confused about that you can explain.  The point is, you can't, none of you advocates of global warming can explain any of this.  You cannot answer any of these questions.  So it has to be framed as a political issue, and you have to use the usual liberal ingredients of fearmongering and scare tactics and fascism and totalitarianism and force people, all your buddies, to accept the premise of something that isn't happening.

You start young. You infect and infiltrate the minds of young, impressionable kids. You get them scared to death that their world isn't gonna exist by the time they become adults. You got your own little army out there advancing your political agenda, and we're not even talking about science, and that's all this is.  Next you can tell me why in 1979 Newsweek's cover was The Coming Ice Age, and then five years later all of a sudden I'm watching This Week with David Brinkley, and to hell with the ice age, now we're talking global warming, in 1985.  We only had 20 years back then in 1985.  We only had 20 years.  If we didn't deal with it the next 20 years, which have come and gone, we weren't gonna be here. 

You can explain to me how in 1988, I was told we only had 10 years to save the oceans.  Last I looked, they're still there, and there's an airplane in 'em that CNN can't find.  So everything that you people on the left have been saying politically or quasi-scientifically about this is just a bunch of BS, un-provable, and only survivable if you turn it into a political issue, as you have, and tailor it to fit your already prejudiced, bigoted notions of your enemies:  corporations, conservatives, religions. Anything that has to do with God cancels out everything you believe, right?  So you gotta get rid of that, too. 

It just burns me up that they've got so many young people scared to death that the world's not gonna be here when they grow up. They're traumatized over this, and they're using fraudulent pictures of polar bears on little pieces of ice that were just made up, which has been proven, by the way, uncovered. 

156 posted on 09/23/2015 2:09:56 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Justice will not be served until those who r unaffected r as outraged as those who r. B Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson