Bump.
Another post mortem of Walker’s failed presidential campaign. IMHO, it was his staff that failed Walker.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin ping list.
Simple—Thinking voters are sick of weather-vane politicians.
I guess if being anti big union was enough - Walker would still be in this thing.
” was simply too confident in his own abilities and often acted, ineptly, as his own campaign manager. “
Too many people hyped him, and he bought into it.
His own campaign manager or not, he did far better that that crew of overpaid cretins that is advising Bush.
I posted this on an earlier thread but well worth a look:
My thought... if you asked people at random across the country if they could name one candidate in the GOP field apart from Trump and Bush, youll come up blanks. Name recognition bias and fame is certainly part of it but the main reason, if youre not already well known on the national level, you have to really sell yourself to make it to the big leagues.
Oh sure, there were nobodies like Carter and Obama whom no one heard of before when they burst into national prominence but theyre exceptions to the rule. Politics is unforgiving and if you dont know how to weather the waves, you can get towed underneath them and drown. Thats what happened to Walker - he never had a good feel for them and once he ceased mastering them, it was inevitable that he was never going to ride them to the top.
With Trump, hes unique because he already has name recognition. The man is a brand and every one in the country has heard about him. Hes managed to get going and although his poll ratings have leveled out, it hasnt really been disastrous. And he knows where the public is at. Trump knows how to manage his time well and what separates him from the field - is that he runs his campaign - not a manager, not consultants and not advisers. He really is his own man.
My thought basically is this: the success of Trump vs the downfall of Walker comes down to one thing: you can either run your campaign as only The Donald himself can run it, or in Walker case, you can let your campaign run you and bury you alive. When you come right to down it again, that could be the critical difference between success and failure on the national stage.
People need to pay as much respect, if not more to how Trump is in the head of things as they are commiserating over how Walker couldnt seem to find the right path to the presidency.
The people of America said and keeps saying they don’t trust politicians, and Perry and Walker are politicians, and they are gone...The three remaining high in the polls are Trump, Carson and Carly....
That should tell you something....
In first person, Walker was just not appealing. Perhaps it was personality, or maybe he couldn't grab attention away from Trump. Whatever it was, it's probably a good thing that he bowed out now, rather than fail against a weak Democrat.
[snip]
He was a terrible candidate, but he also got Trump-ed, said one Walker ally. It sounds more likely that he was Bushwhacked.
Walker and Perry are exactly what the Bush strategy of tying up all the donor money was all about. They can't blame that on Trump. It's only sour grapes to suggest that they might have gotten more fundraising if Trump didn't hog all the media, but it's really Bush squeezing out the donor class that did them in.
-PJ
The citizens want the invasion stopped.
In his exit speech he outed himself as a Cheap Labor Express employee.
A faux outsider who immediately asked others you coalesce around the establishment when the cry baby left
But Walker had far less success raising hard money for his campaign and struggled to bankroll staffers in the states and travel.
That is why Ted Cruz is in such a good position. Not only has he raised more hard cash than anyone else, he has raised his money from vastly more people in mostly small donations than anyone else on the Republican side (Ted Cruz has raised hard cash from to the tune of FIFTEEN TIMES as many contributions tutors as Jeb Bush). Thing is, no matter how much SuperPAC money raised by a candidate like Jeb Bush, they cannot use that money to pay their campaign staff and general campaign costs. Only hard money can do that.
$20 million should have kept him in the race the rest of the year.