This is conspiracy porn. The Polish govt already ruled this a pilot error with interference from the politicos on the Polish airplane who wanted to land ASAP. The Poles would not have spared the Russians in the investigation. And no one was shot on the ground. All bodies were recovered and autopsied.
“This is conspiracy porn.”
Multiple independent investigations by governmental and non-governmental agencies outside of Poland and Russia have determined the Polish aircraft was destroyed by explosives before it plunged into the ground in tens of thousands of pieces. Such independent findings cannot honestly be dismissed as a mere false conspiracy theory, because the evidence they cite in support are thoroughly effective in refuting the Polish Government investigative report.
“The Polish govt already ruled this a pilot error with interference from the politicos on the Polish airplane who wanted to land ASAP.”
The Polish Government responsible for publishing the report were the political opponents of the Polish Government who were killed aboard the flight to Smolensk. Consequently, the Polish Government responsible for the investigative report had the motive, opportunity, and means to have “ruled this a pilot error” in spite of the uncontroverted evidence the crash was not pilot error and was due to hostile explosives.
“The Poles would not have spared the Russians in the investigation.”
False assumption, and a rather tasteless false assumption given the purpose of the flight was to attend a memorial for the victims of the previous Russian mass murders in 1939, which previous Polish Governments colluded with the Russians to deny before independence from the Soviet occupation of Poland. Not only is it possible for the successor Polish Government to have collaborated with Russia to suppress the Russian role in the incident, in some of the proposed scenarios some of the individuals later to be principals in the successor Polish Government are suspects in collaborating with Russia to destroy the aircraft and the Polish Government aboard it. Consequently, it cannot be assumed without proper evidence that the successor Polish Government and its report are above suspicion, especially when the forensic evidence flatly contradicts that government.
“And no one was shot on the ground. All bodies were recovered and autopsied.”
That is a false statement. Not all of the bodies were recovered at the time of the investigative reports nor to the present day. Without a recovery of the bodies, there naturally cannot be a complete set of autopsies. Example:
The death certificates of the victims are cursory, barely containing any basic information, and some certificates are missing. There is doubt (no proof has been provided) that any post-mortem examinations were ever performed in Russia; none were undertaken in Poland, as opening the coffins was strictly forbidden. Families received the bodies of their relatives in sealed coffins, under the threat that they would be prosecuted under Russian criminal law, if coffins were opened or tampered with. No medical evidence has been produced so far.
Shortly after the funerals took place, Russia sent a number of coffins back to Poland with anonymous human remains inside, and claimed that thorough DNA examinations had been performed. Even these unidentified remains, released for burial, had never been inspected. There is no post-mortem examination data available.
All legal evidence is kept in secrecy. Polish authorities have had admittance only to some of the Russian reports, but not to the evidence itself, allegedly accumulated in Russia. The only interrogation ever performed in the presence of Polish army prosecutors in Russia has been withdrawn from files and replaced with a designated updated version, contradicting the original.
http://www.smolenskcrashnews.com/polish-air-crash-disinformation.html