Police and prosecutor both say the warning shots were justified in this case.
1 posted on
09/15/2015 6:53:17 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Bad presidence. Next they will want LEO’s taking warning shots. Now we will have extra rounds flying around.
To: marktwain
Should have shot the driver.
3 posted on
09/15/2015 7:07:57 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: marktwain
Warning shots are almost always never justified.
If you should pull the gun and then the trigger, you should be justified in shooting the bad guy. If you aren’t justified in shooting someone, the gun should stay holstered.
4 posted on
09/15/2015 7:14:13 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: marktwain
It doesn’t seem like it’s “warning shots” per se but that he used the pistol to disable the vehicle and not threaten the snatchers with being shot outright. In short, he used the gun on their car and not on them.
Still tricky legal ground.
5 posted on
09/15/2015 7:14:37 AM PDT by
Bogey78O
(We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
To: marktwain
Shoot to kill. Keep shooting until done.
6 posted on
09/15/2015 7:23:04 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(RINOs EARNED TRUMP! I prefer Cruz, but someone has to kick their A$$!)
To: marktwain
They were both lucky to survive. He could have shot them dead as they were willing to kill by using that car.
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson