Well, that’s a novel approach to “due process”.
Let’s apply this standard to politicians accused of misconduct. I mean “Were not talking about depriving them of life or liberty,” were merely talking about them being made to work for a living, for crying out loud.
Guilt by dissociation............................
Hey Jared!
Can we apply that standard to ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS?
Collective punishment is justified here because all men are guilty by definition.
What is really sickening is all of the people that applauded when he said that.
So a dumped girlfriend has the power to really get back at the boy and there’s nothing he can say or do about it. This is more political correctness. We need laws to deal with the proliferation of political correctness.
BTW, what happened to turning the case over to the police? What the university is doing is acting as cop, judge, and jury. But they have no requirement to be legal or just or fair. Just correct.
He’s also a homosexual.
A recent article identified in Edward II court records as Roger F*edbythenavel. His descendants are alive and well, all serving in the Congress.
Scratch the surface of a Democrat and you see the totalitarian underneath.
Why do I never hear: “We’re not depriving them of cake, we’re just making them seek out a different bakery.”
In a just world, our DoJ would be filing Civil Rights violations against universities on a regular basis.
You all see it - the Left has reached critical mass. They know they can say (and do) anything they want now for The Revolution, secure in the knowledge that not only will they be opposed, they will be celebrated.
Everything from public sodomy, to confiscation of employment and property without due process, to suppression of free speech and religious liberty, is on their table.
Eventually, they will apply their full power on the crown jewel: Gun Confisctation.
That’s a ridiculous approach.
Under that approach, we’d just bomb Detroit and Chicago to improve the crime rate.
But can we take that approach to Muslim immigrants? It’s not like deporting them we are depriving them of life and liberty.
It makes no sense, and is not fair, to expel a student based on a mere sexual assault accusation. But then again, it also doesn't make sense to allow the suspect to be in close contact with the alleged victim, like in a classroom or in a dorm building.
The solution would seem, to me, to have the college work out a plan were the suspect and alleged victim must stay far apart. If that means adjusting class schedules or changing rooming arrangements, so be it.
Ah, the Salem Witch Trials, now on campus.
Re-read this sentence. Is the author honestly advocating an "accusation = expulsion" standard? And there would be absolutely no repercussions from THAT!
The Rolling Stone Standard of guilt or innocence. What’s wrong with that?