Posted on 09/14/2015 5:25:31 AM PDT by HomerBohn
Obama has ordered that America take in 70,000 Islamic refugees. Just today, press secretary Josh Earnest said that the United States would "accept at least 10,000 refugees in the next fiscal year," which begins October 1st; however, the whole number that has been authorized is 70,000. But John Kerry, in a closed-door meeting, said that the number could be raised even higher—to 100,000. According to one report:
Earlier, Secretary of State John Kerry said, at a closed-door meeting on Capitol Hill, that the total number of refugees taken in by the United States could rise to more than 100,000, from the current figure of 70,000.
When these "refugees" come, what do you think will happen? The French police are already looking for an ISIS agent amongst the refugees who are heading for England.
La Voix du Nord newspaper reported:
An Islamic State combatant believed to be in Calais is being actively hunted by the authorities. … He left Syria at the end of August and hopes to reach Britain where he intends to commit terrorist acts. …He is the subject of most wanted person notice and is considered a threat to state security.
Hungary's most popular national TV channel, M1, reported Tuesday thst Islamic terrorists are amongst the refugees and are disguising themselves as refugees:
Islamist terrorists, disguised as refugees, have showed up in Europe. [The] pictures were uploaded on various social networks to show that terrorists are now present in most European cities. Many, who are now illegal immigrants, fought alongside Islamic State before
Here is a photo of one of the terrorists, who is said by Hungarian media to be disguising himself as a refugee:
One of the terrorists, Laith Al Saleh, 30, was reported by the AP to have "led a 700-strong rebel unit in Syria's civil war." No doubt this is a terrorist, and there is no doubt that the US will be getting these types in its land. Reg. Whitaker, a national security specialist, said:
It is possible that among the stream of wretched refugees desperately looking for a way, that there might be some who aren't exactly the people we want to bring in
Stephen Harper, Canada's Prime Minister, is also expressing concerns that amongst the refugees there are terrorists, saying:
When we are dealing with people that are from, in many cases, a terrorist war zone, we are going to make sure that we screen people appropriately and the security of this country is fully protected.
(Watch video at link)
Why are Republican Congressrats allowing Obama to ignore the Constitution? Almost all GOP voters are wondering why this is being allowed to happen. It does indeed appear that the USA is a one party system with two heads. Rather like a snake!
Americans and Europeans have forgotten 9/11 as they make it easier for much more horror to erupt.
Martha’s Vineyard will never be the same. Oh. Wait. MV probably won’t get any.
I would hope the GOP would try to stop him, but we know how that will go.
Move them into gated communities of the MSM, and Hollywood..
This is such BS. I can’t believe America voted for this POS twice.
It would be a shame if whatever boat is carrying these animals was to have a mishap in the middle of the Atlantic....
This must be stopped.
how much is the Lutheran Church being paid off from taxpayer money?
taqiyyah,-- In Islam, the practice of concealing one’s belief and foregoing ordinary religious duties when under threat of death or injury.-- Lying to non-Muslims in advance for Islam is allowed till Judgment Day Quran 3:28, 16:106
-- It is fine to deceive the infidels. They are just pigs anyways. In fact, al-Taqiyyah of the Qur'an compels protection of Islam by deception.
Can’t wait tell the first head choppin happens at a mall near you. Than patriots will go rag head hunting followed by president oreo wanting our guns. It’s a plan folks! Plus the Gov. needs someone that has no problem killing Christians. These people are already trained.
congress must refuse to fund the bringing of even a SINGLE muslim here!
“I would hope the GOP would try to stop him, but we know how that will go.”.....
I am afraid you are correct, the GOP ALL, repeat ALL need to be replaced from top to bottom if this is allowed.
VIDEO: Red Skelton Pledge Of Allegiance, 14 January 1969
I: Me, an individual, a committee of one.And now, boys and girls, let me hear you recite the Pledge of Allegiance:PLEDGE: Dedicate all of my worldly goods to give without self pity.
ALLEGIANCE: My love and my devotion.
TO THE FLAG: Our standard, Old Glory, a symbol of freedom. Wherever she waves, there's respect because your loyalty has given her a dignity that shouts freedom is everybody's job.
UNITED: That means that we have all come together.
STATES: Individual communities that have united into 48 great states. Forty-eight individual communities with pride and dignity and purpose; all divided with imaginary boundaries yet united to a common purpose, and that's love for country.>/I>
AND TO THE REPUBLIC: A state in which sovereign power is invested in representatives chosen by the people to govern. And government is the people, and it's from the people to the leaders, not from the leaders to the people.
FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION: One nation, meaning "so blessed by God."
INDIVISIBLE: Incapable of being divided.
WITH LIBERTY: Which is freedom, the right of power to live one's own life without threats, fear, or some sort of retaliation.
AND JUSTICE: The principle or quality of dealing fairly with others.
FOR ALL: For all, which means, boys and girls, it's as much your country as it is mine.
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country, and two words have been added to the Pledge of Allegiance: "under God." Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer, and that would be eliminated from schools too?
Where does the funding come from? Couldn’t Congress tell Obama and the State Dept. not to import more because they wouldn’t fund it?
And 100,000 probably means 250,000 . . . .
Have you seen this one? It will be more like several million when they are through, but they will all be in place and ready for the 2016 election day. Should Obama decide to allow one. Should he decide to have an election, their votes for Democrats plus their elimination of the opposing by separating them from their heads will give the Democrats the edge they need. But it is what the American public voted for.
Buy more ammo, we are going to need it to protect ourselves when our elected “leaders” will not.
Anyone see the reasoning behind "The Right to Bear Arms"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.