“Yet, isn’t this why we are lionizing Trump — becausee he’s willing to stand up, speak up, be politically incorrect and say “Hell, no!”?”
Trump certainly would have no stomach to react that way. He, along with people worldwide, have seen the baby boy floating in the water. It is very upsetting. Trump’s enemies would accuse him of being abusive to the helpless when he definitely is NOT abusive to the helpless. From the accounts I have read, he is always helping the helpless. Trump goes after someone who attacks —the big game—but not people who cannot fight back or are weak.
It will be like our southern border. The more you help, the more will be enticed to flood in.
I noticed Thomas Sowell wrote that there is not too much anyone can do for the situation. It has gotten out of hand, thanks to Obama. And with the Iranian deal, it is going to get inconceivably worse. He is the one who should be called to account and not some Republican candidate.
Now, I’ll have to say, the ones I have seen on TV are definitely not helpless nor weak. They are just gutless, in my estimation (or infiltrators). If they got in the face of the terrorists like they do to the Europeans trying to help them, they probably would not be in the shape they are in.
It's the equivocation that bothers me. He's done it on deportation. He's done it on Planned Parenthood. Equivocation seems to follow each of his declarative statements. It suggests that he's a man who knows how to move the crowd, but hasn't thought through his position in its entirety. Nor is he committed to act in accordance.