Posted on 09/06/2015 4:26:18 AM PDT by HomerBohn
It was a picture of Judge David Bunning. Maybe it was a Getty image or somesuch, that could not be posted on FR.
LOL
I suppose what I should do is issue the standard FReeper reply in cases like this, since I am apparently bruising your ego. So I will.
“Are You Logged in?”
If this judge really cared about his state’s youth he wouldn’t be bench bullying them into accepting a high-risk chosen behavior.
___________________________________
REAL love is telling someone the truth, and praying they will turn away from this sin before it entangles them and destroys them. FACTS over fantasy!
Health Risks of the Homosexual Lifestyle
The current media portrayal of gay and lesbian relationships is that they are as healthy, stable and loving as heterosexual marriages or even more so.1 Medical associations are promoting somewhat similar messages.2 Sexual relationships between members of the same sex, however, expose gays, lesbians and bisexuals to extreme risks of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), physical injuries, mental disorders and even a shortened life span. There are five major distinctions between gay and heterosexual relationships, with specific medical consequences. They are:
http://factsaboutyouth.com/posts/health-risks-of-the-homosexual-lifestyle/
Explaining to a progressive liberal that Mayor DeBlasio’s wife changed her sexuality shuts up the progressive liberals that say a person’s sexuality can’t be changed.
Kim Davis and the KY Clerks Association tried to solve this before it became an issue. They petitioned the in-session KY legislature to remove the clerk’s signature from the certificate.
The evidence doesn’t support your suspicion.
That judge, a Bush appointee.........
Sure.......
I am not generally the “thread police”, but I saw something that was confusing and I could not walk away as I usually do..
Another time....perhaps
Jim Bunning was a great pitcher and a great senator but apparently along with his wife, a piss poor parent.
Reality check: Trump has said that his rampaging pro-abort federal district judge sister would make a great appointment to the SCOTUS. Who gets the first appointment? David Bunning or Trump’s sister? This is not personal but it does raise the question of the lack of consistency in rightfully objecting to David Bunning and his role in perverting the USA but not Trump who also allowed a “transgender” to compete in his Miss Universe contest.
What goes on publicly need not be same as what goes on privately, especially with politicians or homosexual activists.
E.g. she also petitioned judge with similar request, but both could have been part of the same game choreographed for the public consumption. If she is playing her part with judge, she could have been playing it with other collaborators in the legislature. The house there has Democrat majority if I recall correctly anyway (not that "Republican" label means all that much more than the money that bought their office last).
Frankly, I don't trust any theater politicians, bureaucrats and the cronies buying them are playing for the public consumption. My default assumption is that the scum that floated to the top of their cesspool is lying to us as usually.
There are hundreds of Republican Congressmen. You would think at least one of them might take a little time to draft articles of impeachment.
After the initial resolution of the Boyd County case, Judge Bunning decided against the school system again in 2006, ruling that it could not let students who opposed gay rights opt out of anti-harassment sessions. He was overruled by an appellate court.
In 2007, sitting temporarily on the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, he was part of a three-judge panel that unanimously struck down a Michigan law banning the procedure that abortion opponents call partial-birth abortion.
So David Bunning... regardless of people's "personal opinions", they should have started rounding up all the escaped slaves and sending them back to their owners after the Dred Scott ruling, right?
Only the Senate Sergeant At Arms could possibly arrest a sitting president.
But there would have to be charges and a warrant which is never, ever going to ever happen.
Presidents have always ignored laws when they saw fit. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus; Truman tried to seize steel mills; many presidents, including George W Bush have made extensive use of “signing statements”, which are supposed to allow them to bend laws as they see fit.
So, it’ll never happen, because once it happened, it would be used to bludgeon every single office holder from then on.
Honestly, I find myself aghast at all the supposed conservatives who are desperately trying to rationalize not supporting this woman. Aghast and disgusted.
Explain everything away, they do, and using their historical pontifications as if no other FReeper has been to school. Circular reasoning is the seasoning on FR threads this weekend, regarding this subject.
Sky pilot is a homo?
No way
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.