Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus

It’s the lies, Nero Germanicus. It’s unseemly for you, a liberal, to come on a conservative site and pimp lies for Obama. That’s not what the site wast set up for.

And none of your, ‘I’m really a conservative,’ garbage. A conservative would not lie to help Obama when the truth hurts him. In this case, the truth was inglorious and, frankly, disastrous for Obama.

So what did you do? You deleted all the FACTS that hurt Obama and substituted a pristine fairytale for his benefit.

Conservatives don’t do that, Nero Germanicus. Liberal obot trolls do that.

This is your MO. In every case you select whatever version of a story most benefits Obama, and you post it. You have NEVER slipped up and posted any version, spin or scenario unfavorable to Obama. You have lied in Obama’s favor, but you have never even come close to lying to harm him [not that this is advocated.]

Of course the giveaway comes when you’re corrected. Then you display all the moral depth of a sociopathic fourteen yo. I.e.: you go full metal troll.

Your behavior is not good for the site. If you can’t post the truth when it hurts Obama, you need to rethink your purpose. “Demoralizing conservatives” is a pathetic pastime.


196 posted on 09/09/2015 11:27:12 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

Not to butt in... but I’m butting in.
About the title... not about your argument...

Any liberal Obama supporter that says Cruz isn’t qualified due to citizenship issues...

I will personally kick square in the crotch.


197 posted on 09/09/2015 11:31:16 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

To: Fantasywriter

From the article which is the subject of this thread:
“In conclusion, not a single argument put forth by the eligibility challengers holds up. Each is either a misinterpretation at best or an outright falsehood at worst. Arguing over this issue has become a waste of time much better spent on other things. Unfortunately, there are a few folks who continue to cling to this view, and equally unfortunate is the often venomous attitude they display toward anyone who disagrees with them. Most of the arguments you may encounter will consist of one or more of the claims we have covered above. And most of the time, they will count on you not bothering to actually try to research or verify what they claim a particular court case says. Consider this your “Cliff Notes” on all their arguments—a concise, documented reference to all that is wrong about their claims.”

Conservatives value debate and conservatives can disagree with each other as an expression of our God-Given First Amendment rights.


198 posted on 09/09/2015 12:54:12 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson