Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/04/2015 6:59:26 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
Just running that private e-mail server is asking for trouble in the FIRST place, especially considering how easy it is to compromise a private e-mail server if the administrator of the server isn't EXTREMELY diligent in keeping all security measures constantly updated. As such, I wouldn't be surprised that both the Russian FSB and the Chinese Ministry of State Security have the full contents of Hillary Clinton's private e-mail server by now.
2 posted on 09/04/2015 7:02:53 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

The issue here is NOT compromise of classified material.

This elaborate deception involved 1) Purchasing computer equipment to run the “server”, 2) hiring IT staff to create the infrastructure, 3) Instructing the Clinton team (Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, and others) how to strip classified designators and the importance of doing so, and 4) training State Department staff about how to do this highly (for a bureaucrat) unnatural means of email forwarding.

THEY DID NOT DO THIS SIMPLY TO MISHANDLE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION. THEY DID IT FOR A REASON.

And, they were all aware from the very beginning that what they were doing was a crime, at least in the technical sense if not outright. It was expensive, and it was risky.

So, what possible motive could the Clinton Crime Family had for doing this?

Find the motive, discover the real crimes.


4 posted on 09/04/2015 7:11:53 AM PDT by Jim Noble (You walk into the room like a camel and then you frown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

She is in too deep. Everywhere she turns there is a hungry predator. She will feign illness and make a blameless exit.


5 posted on 09/04/2015 7:12:42 AM PDT by Battle Axe (Repent: for the coming of the Lord is soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

But but but
We know the democrat party is loaded with people highly concerned about and deducted to,protecting US national security by prosecuting violators

Ask Scooter Libby


6 posted on 09/04/2015 7:12:51 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

She does not care one whit about ‘National Security’ or anybody elses, either (read Israel). All she cares about is power, money and adulation..............................


7 posted on 09/04/2015 7:17:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Unsurprisingly, the House Benghazi Committee’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), leaped to Clinton’s defense. He insisted the subpoena issued by Committee Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) was an effort to smear her. “Although multiple legal experts agree there is no evidence of criminal activity, it is certainly understandable that this witness’s attorneys advised him to assert his Fifth Amendment rights, especially given the onslaught of wild and unsubstantiated accusations by Republican presidential candidates, members of Congress and others based on false leaks about the investigation,” Cummings declared. “Their insatiable desire to derail Secretary Clinton’s presidential campaign at all costs has real consequences for any serious congressional effort.”


9 posted on 09/04/2015 7:21:16 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson