“The idea of natural law superceding [sic] this court’s authority would be a dangerous precedent indeed,” U.S. District Judge David L. Bunning told Rowan County clerk Kim Davis.
The above quote should scare the living h3ll out of each one of us. The fact that this arrogance is not the lede everyplace shows the utter tyranny into which this country has descended.
First he suckled at the teet of wealth and notoriety. Secondly, I hope she says, “Your Honor, is that all ya got/”
It’s clowns like this black-robed turd that makes me have contempt for all of the so called, “courts” and the bozos who run them. They are nothing but a joke and the joke is on us.
You can bet judgey’s fag buddies are happy. He locked up another Christian.
Alexander Hamilton
“Without justice being freely, fully, and impartially administered, neither our persons, nor our rights, nor our property, can be protected. And if these, or either of them, are regulated by no certain laws, and are subject to no certain principles, and are held by no certain tenure, and are redressed, when violated, by no certain remedies, society fails of all its value; and men may as well return to a state of savage and barbarous independence.”
— Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833
Is this the Judge? I think so but not completely sure.
http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2001/12/16/loc_4connections_factor.html
Theres gonna be a lot more, lot more, lot more deaths in cwii. There are so many king georges and so many tyrant servants to deal with.
Where’s the outrage from the senior senator about the Federal courts in his state? or does he condone it actions? I suspect the latter.
Just like that congressrat saying about Obamacare that the constitution allows Congress to do anything they like.
this leftwing judge would feel right at home in the 3rd Reich or the USSR.
in contrast to this so called judge of the law, some very godly, professing Christian men affixed their good names the founding Law for these united States of America:
“When in the Course of Human Events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands...with another...,and assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God entitle them,...”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights,...—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish...”
this “judge” and some others even here need to be reminded who wrote the Law and with Whom it actually originates. they also need to be reminded that among the people in these united States, ALL political power derives from the “consent of the governed” as the governed determines, by whatever Lawful processes as required by God, what exactly is the common good. the common good is nothing less than the unambiguous and uncontroversial agreed upon rule or body of Law, receiving the aforesaid consent.
It should be pointed out that the "judge" is implicitly admitting that his actions violate the natural law.
It should also be pointed out that in a sense the judge's quote is correct. The idea of natural law superseding the court's CLAIMED authority IS dangerous. Dangerous to the wicked notion that any judge has the authority to violate the natural law or the Constitution.
But it is NOT dangerous to the rule of law, as he asserts. In fact, just the opposite is the case. The natural law is the American basis for the rule of law. It is its foundation.
The Islamic States have their black robes and FedGov has its black robes.
“We hold these things to be self-evident,” but certain judges do not. How did they make it into office? Who were their overseers in passing the bar? Were they ordinary citizens, or were they other judges and lawyers?
The way I see it, our legal system - the one that has evolved into a ruling elite devoid of natural sense and reason - has been left unaccountable to anyone but themselves. What recourse does the general public have in testing, appointing, and judging judges? There must be a means to impeach this one in particular, who bluntly places himself and others above natural law, i.e. the self-evident truths enunciated, circumscribed, guaranteed, and legally efficacious through our founding documents.
“True law is right reason in agreement with nature; it is of universal application, unchanging and everlasting; it summons to duty by its commands, and averts from wrong-doing by its prohibitions. And it does not lay its commands or prohibitions upon good men in vain, although neither have any effect on the wicked. It is a sin to try to alter this law, nor is it allowable to attempt to repeal a part of it, and it is impossible to abolish it entirely. We cannot be freed from its obligations by Senate or People, and we need not look outside ourselves for an expounder or interpreter of it. And there will not be different laws at Rome and at Athens, or different laws now and in the future, but one eternal and unchangeable law will be valid for all nations and all times, and there will be one master and ruler, that is, God, over us all, for He is the author of this law, its promulgator, and its enforcing judge. Whoever is disobedient is fleeing from himself and denying his human nature, and by reason of this very fact he will suffer the worst penalties, even if he escapes what is commonly called punishment ...”
— Marcus Tullius Cicero, 59 - 47 B.C.
This judge needs to be tar and feathered and rode out of town.
-- President Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address
He believes himself god.
He will find out that God will not be mocked.
Kim Davis: Prisoner of Conscience. Jailed for refusing a lawless order to sign fraudulent legal documents.
“Human law is law only by virtue of its accordance with right reason; and thus it is manifest that it flows from the eternal law. And in so far as it deviates from right reason it is called an unjust law; in such case it is no law at all, but rather a species of violence.”
— Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae, Ia-Ilae, q. xciii, art. 3, ad 2m.
“Government...should be formed to secure and to enlarge the exercise of natural rights of its members, and every government, which has not this in view, as its principle object, is not a government of the legitimate kind.”
— James Wilson