Skip to comments.
Exclusive: Hillary Paid to Hide Identity of the People Running Her Email Server
Breitbart Big Government ^
| 9-2-15
| Patrick Howley
Posted on 09/03/2015 12:31:18 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic
I don’t think there’s much to this angle.
I pay extra to have my domain’s information not made public. Saves hassles from domain pirates, etc. “Private” is a standard offering from domain registrars, lots of folks use it.
2
posted on
09/03/2015 12:39:32 AM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Who else has contracts with Perfect Privacy? Or is this a one-customer company built out of thin air? Sounds like we need a couple of folks doing what Congress or the FBI won’t do.
To: D-fendr
Does your server have top secret national security data on it, and do the people running your server have the security clearances necessary to handle such top secret national security data?
4
posted on
09/03/2015 12:47:44 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless)
To: chris37
No, but that’s not my point.
It’s not an unusual thing to make your domain info private.
5
posted on
09/03/2015 12:49:21 AM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Those felonies just keep on dripping out through that cast iron adult diaper of her’s.
6
posted on
09/03/2015 12:52:35 AM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Stupid non-story for clickbaiters.
7
posted on
09/03/2015 12:53:08 AM PDT
by
Southack
(The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
To: D-fendr
That’s cool, I can understand that, however, she was the custodian of top secret national security data, and she let it be handled by people who did not have clearance to see it much less handle it.
That is a serious felony on her part.
8
posted on
09/03/2015 1:02:38 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless)
To: chris37
Deutch was similarly careless with classified files. We have only her word that the 30,000 emails deleted--and wiped--weren't classified. Her word is crap.
9
posted on
09/03/2015 1:20:50 AM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Fakistan)
To: D-fendr
10
posted on
09/03/2015 1:50:34 AM PDT
by
Ray76
(When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Hillary is a PARANOID CROOK!!
11
posted on
09/03/2015 2:32:09 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
12
posted on
09/03/2015 3:01:39 AM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: afraidfortherepublic
13
posted on
09/03/2015 3:03:08 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: D-fendr
Its not an unusual thing to make your domain info private.
It is when you're the Secretary of State and have taken an oath to defend the Constitution which includes safeguarding critical data dealing with the national security of the United States.
Nothing at all wrong with a private citizen seeking to keep their personal information private, however the Secretary of State is NOT a private citizen, especially when she co-mingled her own personal data with official government data on an unsecured non-government email server.
Hillary Rotten Clinton is a traitor, either by design or by default. She needs to be indicted, tried and convicted of treason, and then hung by the neck until dead.
14
posted on
09/03/2015 3:25:46 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Trump is the barbarian at the RINO gate, Cruz is his 'inside man' and I LIKE it !!)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Once again - the search for evidence of a technical crime (mishandling classified information) misses the point.
ALL THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON.
The reason was NOT to facilitate handling of classified material. The reason was to cover up something.
What that something was will provide evidence of much, MUCH more serious crimes - bribery, money laundering, tax evasion, criminal conspiracy to commit 1-3, misprision of multiple felonies, perhaps even espionage and treason.
15
posted on
09/03/2015 3:30:06 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(You walk into the room like a camel and then you frown)
To: chris37
however, she was the custodian of top secret national security data, and she let it be handled by people who did not have clearance to see it much less handle it. That is a serious felony on her partChickenfeed.
Figure out why she and Bill did this, and you send all three Clintons away for a long time.
16
posted on
09/03/2015 3:31:26 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(You walk into the room like a camel and then you frown)
To: Jim Noble
I agree they need to dig deeper than this and come up with something more serious, otherwise the little people will take the fall (and a nod to you, Web Hubbell) and Hillary will skate away as usual.
Then again, sometimes chickenfeed is enough, if they can show Hillary's fingerprints on everything. Remember they got Capone on tax evasion, not murder, extortion, conspiracy, racketeering, etc. If chickenfeed will keep The Shrill One away from the WH, that will avoid the larger disaster.
17
posted on
09/03/2015 3:39:02 AM PDT
by
chimera
To: PhilDragoo
Wondering what criteria or sorting method did they use to delete 30,000 e-mails.
Seems that net did not identify some classified and top secret messages for deletion.
Did they sort the messages based on the senders? Did the isolate mails marked for Hillary, and her top three staff, and deleted all others? Did the perform a key word search?
To: Jim Noble
Why not just put her in jail for the clear felonies we have in front of us?
Al Capone was put in jail for ‘chickenfeed’.
19
posted on
09/03/2015 4:09:36 AM PDT
by
agere_contra
(Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
To: D-fendr
“I pay extra to have my domains information not made public. Saves hassles from domain pirates, etc. Private is a standard offering from domain registrars, lots of folks use it.”
LOL, not lots of government entities handling Top Secret documents and information. She did exactly what you do. If you’re Secretary of State, you don’t do that...it is illegal. Seriously!?
20
posted on
09/03/2015 4:19:51 AM PDT
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson