Posted on 09/02/2015 2:01:29 PM PDT by naturalman1975
There is something very odd about the NOAA claim of a very hot July, thanks to global warming:
July was the hottest month on Earth since records began...
Take the NOAA map above. Check Australia, said to have had average or above-average temperatures over much of the continent, apart from the much-warmer-than-average bits around Sydney and parts of Western Australia.
Liberal MP Craig Kelly is curious:
HOW DOES THE COLDEST MONTH IN 20 YEARS BECOME THE HOTTEST MONTH EVER ?
July in Melbourne was widely reported as the Coldest July in 20 years
It also was reported at the start of August that Sydney had just notched its longest cold spell in 26 years and it was also the coolest July for the city since 2002
Even our Bureau of Meteorology reported; Temperatures were below average across Sydney during July
However, have close look at the below map produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) an Obama Government agency (the same people that assert that July 2015 was the hottest month ever).
NOAA assert that temperatures in Melbourne for July 2015 were Warmer than Average and for Sydney they were Much warmer than average.
Can anyone explain this ?
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.news.com.au ...
The temperature has been increased in lockstep with the chocolate ration.
Because they're lying.
Let's not overthink this.
for our brothers and sisters down under that may be unfamilar with American democrats... let me provide some insight.
whenever a democrat communicates, what will be produced will be lies. they are the party of no ethics or morals. they commit fraud like you prepare breakfast, and just as regularly.
Here, we had a cool and wet Spring and seasonal Summer weather. Much cooler and more pleasant than we were in drought a few years ago.
Bookmark.
Actually, there isn’t as much difference in the two maps as the author suggests. The NASA map suggests a slightly warmer average temperature, but not dramatically so.
I think I heard our August average this year was 84. 84! One of the cooler ones I remember.
It would be interesting to see if the problem is with NOAA’s current data or with the historical data. I bet the second because it is far easier to lie about old data and refuse to publish the raw data.
To the Left, lies and ‘truth’ are of equal importance, and equal validity. Does a ‘lie’ advance the Ultimate Victory of Socialism? Then, it is justified. It’s for the People’s welfare, so Ends justify Means.
I remember when that put up that satellite to measure global warming (about 10 year ago or so). I thought at the time it was a big waste of money. Now, I now it was, because it shows - from space - that there is no global warming. But the left ignores it.
Scientific data only works when it works for them.
Oh, well . . .
Yes, I can explain it - they LIE!
Because global warming causes global cooling - get it?
Starting to catch on to what is going on?
they take actual temperatures and then add a couple of degrees to match their computer models and WaLaa: cold is now HOT.
With over 2000 record cold temps set here in the USA earlier this year, we still managed the HOTTEST YEAR EVER ON RECORD!!! EVER!!!
Any my AGW Hysterion associates still can’t understand why I am a “denier.”
Problem with NOAA data is it does not show SE Australia as being significantly cooler than normal. It was. If you notice over half of the record global warm record readings were in the ocean. So yes if you were a fish it was hot. The error, besides the obvious biases, is taking only surface temps of the Ocean. The Oceans are three dimensional heat sinks. If Ocean current slows, the heat sink is less efficient.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.