Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fungi

There is at least one key difference.

When the clerk took the job it wasn’t required she issue same sex marriage licenses. In other words it wasn’t what she signed up for.

When the stewardess took the job, it was an expected part of the job from the start. It is what she signed up for and is now balking after the fact.


18 posted on 09/01/2015 5:42:00 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: DB

Ding, excellent point, my guess is she was an “at will” employee and she was contractually obligated to perform the task, anything else is insubordination and grounds for dismissal. If she had issues about alcohol, she shouldn’t have taken the job, religious or not.


22 posted on 09/01/2015 5:46:36 PM PDT by taildragger (It's Cruz & Walker. Anything else is a Yugo with Racing Stripes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: DB

Here’s a clue. Employers have the right to make job changes. Employees can carry out the changes or ge fired. No job must be set in concrete and stay the same as when you hire in or employers would wait 40 years in some cases to name changes.

When a court issues case law the employer must carry it out and the employees follow suit.


42 posted on 09/01/2015 7:43:38 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: DB

There is a second key difference. The clerk was ELECTED, not hired.


48 posted on 09/02/2015 6:49:46 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson