But there is no evidence that the anti-abortion group behind the attack made up dialogue.
But there is no evidence that the anti-abortion group behind the attack made up dialogue.
But there is no evidence that the anti-abortion group behind the attack made up dialogue.
But there is no evidence that the anti-abortion group behind the attack made up dialogue.
But there is no evidence that the anti-abortion group behind the attack made up dialogue.
Hey Evil Baby Killers, give some specifics on how these were manipulated or shut up.
> “A report commissioned by Planned Parenthood has ....”
No need to read further.
Even if that is true, and I have no reason to believe people who have no qualms about butchering babies, the fact is that 100% of their "health centers" butcher babies.
Report commissioned by Al Capone shows FBI selective in prosecuting mafia figures.
(Yes,I know he was never tried)
Kinda like Iran inspecting their own nuclear sights no?
To say the obvious “the raw footage was edited” and equate that with deceit is no different than news organizations do every day.
What has to be irrefutably shown is manipulation of edited frame dialogue. IOW, there is no ‘there’ here.
Obfuscation, diversion (squirrel) and all that crap.
And all of the raw footage is available on line for inspection.
This “research firm” doesn’t work for the courts, the military, etc. It’s a dirt-digging political ops firm.
Admitting the truth lower down in the article doesn’t really matter. The writer is counting on few people reading past the headline.
“only two of the 59 Planned Parenthood affiliates are currently involved in fetal tissue research”
Denver, Houston, California..? I’m confused...
“Manipulated” can mean edited for time, length, clarity.....notice the headline didn’t say “inaccurate”.
The facts and content were not manipulated and thats ALL THAT MATTERS
there was no widespread evidence of substantive video manipulation.
there was no widespread evidence of substantive video manipulation.
there was no widespread evidence of substantive video manipulation.
From the article.
Every story ever broadcast by the lamestream media has been edited. The big difference is that the lamestream media refuses to release their unedited footage.
Remember Katie Couric’s interview of Sarah Palin? 99% of the footage was cut out and a very carefully edited 1% was broadcast.
From now on, I would like to see every Republican Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate demand copies of the complete raw feed of all interviews as a condition for giving any. The lamestream media company will be free to broadcast what they want, but as soon as they broadcast any of it then the candidates will be free to use any of the raw feed however they want.
Is the research firm Fusion GPS, run by Dan Blather?
The video makers are releasing full, unedited footage for each instance as well, making short work of these paid-for “findings”.
Sounds like a challenge to release more video... I doubt that will work out in PP's favor AT ALL.
The others all temporarily suspended their baby part selling operations after the videos started coming out.
So how much taxpayer money did they spend on this?