Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

I have to say, based on looking at the photo on Wikipedia, that I do not like the Amber Room. Appreciate the work that went into it, but I could not stand to stay in it for more than 2 minutes. Too much going on there for my taste.


84 posted on 08/26/2015 5:53:01 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Bigg Red

What people wrote about it is that it was dazzling to the eyes and senses in that the sun, reflected light and candle light would hit the room in certain ways that when walking in it the amber would glisten and sparkle in such a way to appear that the room was alive and moving.

It was also full of carvings that tell a long history. So it’s a jewel, an art, a book and a wonder all at once.

I guess one has to see it to understand why people went on about it so much.


86 posted on 08/26/2015 6:33:38 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: Bigg Red

I’m with you. Retro aristocracy bling. Ornament is obsolete


95 posted on 09/02/2015 10:20:21 AM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson