Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court rules two bikers were jailed with sufficient probable cause.
Waco Tribune ^ | 8/21/2015 | OLIVIA MESSER

Posted on 08/21/2015 4:42:00 PM PDT by mac_truck

In an opinion released Thursday, Justice Rex Davis of the 10th Court of Appeals declared that officials had sufficient probable cause to arrest two bikers after the May 17 Twin Peaks shootout in Waco.

The melee killed nine men and injured another 20, resulting in the arrest of 177 bikers, each initially held on controversial $1 million bonds on a charge of engaging in organized criminal activity.

Final autopsy reports were released last week on the nine killed in the melee, but ballistics evidence remains publicly unavailable, pending the completion of an investigation headed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Both bikers involved in the ruling, Marcus Pilkington, 36, of Mexia, and Reginald Weathers, 43, of Forney, are represented by Austin attorney Adam Reposa.

Pilkington and Weathers filed applications asserting that they “were being illegally confined” and that officials lacked probable cause that the two were guilty of engaging in organized criminal activity that day.

Thursday’s ruling cites a section of the Texas Penal Code which states that a person commits the offense if, “with intent to establish, maintain, or participate in a combination or in the profits of combination or as a member of a criminal street gang, the person commits or conspires to commit one or more of the following: murder, capital murder ... (or) aggravated assault.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wacotrib.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bikers; shootout; waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2015 4:42:00 PM PDT by mac_truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

A melee killed people? Is that some kind of Fed Govt AI storm trooper?


2 posted on 08/21/2015 4:44:36 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“A melee killed people? Is that some kind of Fed Govt AI storm trooper?”

No. More descriptive of the bikers.

me·lee noun: melee; plural noun: melees; noun: mêlée; plural noun: mêlées

a confused fight, skirmish, or scuffle.


3 posted on 08/21/2015 5:03:57 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Were the BATFE involved before or during this “action”?


4 posted on 08/21/2015 5:06:12 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
If they were, it hasn't been made public. There has been a lot of conjecture about BATFE having UC players at the meeting, including some who have said agents instigated the shooting, but that is really hard to believe. Not because the BATFE doesn't do sketchy and illegal things, but no UC agent is going to purposely start a gun fight from the middle where he is very likely to take rounds.

Publicly, they showed up after the shooting to assist with the crime scene and the bullets recovered were sent to their labs. The bodies were sent out of house as well, to an organization in Dallas. From the name I can't tell if it is public or private.

5 posted on 08/21/2015 5:18:11 PM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Just a point of information - the venue here happens to be a court of appeals, but the action was not an appeal. Examining trials are “preliminary hearings,” and decisions rendered in these proceedings are not appealable.


6 posted on 08/21/2015 5:21:54 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

You are correct.

-btw There were two more examining trials cancelled on Weds. and three more on the docket for Monday.


7 posted on 08/21/2015 5:33:28 PM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

The die is cast - all the judges are going to see probable cause. Better to get bail conditions lifted, which the DA is willing to do in lieu of participation in examining trial.


8 posted on 08/21/2015 5:39:16 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

” Examining trials are “preliminary hearings,” and decisions rendered in these proceedings are not appealable.”

If the ET does not find probable cause, the LE can still indict.


9 posted on 08/21/2015 6:07:07 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
-- If the ET does not find probable cause, the LE can still indict. --

This is true. Examining trials and preliminary hearings are a waste in practice. But, the act of indictment is not an appeal of an adverse decision at the preliminary hearing. It is an independent act by the grand jury.

10 posted on 08/21/2015 6:10:48 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
"ballistics evidence remains publicly unavailable"

Does anyone honestly think if the bikers were the killers, we would still be waiting for the evidence to be released? Maybe the bikers did it, but it just smells like a coverup to me.

11 posted on 08/21/2015 6:51:54 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; Paladin2
Well, if they had "probabble cause" to arrest TWO of the 177 bikers, that should give gruberment officials across the nation probable cause to arrest any biker on sight...
12 posted on 08/21/2015 7:15:43 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Were the BATFE involved before or during this “action”?

That's the $64 thousand dollar question. Who is that undercover cop and what was he doing minutes before? Probably cause because they were wearing vests. We've heard that here before.

13 posted on 08/21/2015 8:05:57 PM PDT by bgill ( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
so this is an admission there was no probable cause for the others???
14 posted on 08/21/2015 8:56:01 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“Well, if they had “probabble cause” to arrest TWO of the 177 bikers, that should give gruberment officials across the nation probable cause to arrest any biker on sight... “

Not all bikers are part of gangs. Shame on you for thinking that all bikers are members of gangs.


15 posted on 08/21/2015 9:00:23 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

“Does anyone honestly think if the bikers were the killers, we would still be waiting for the evidence to be released? Maybe the bikers did it, but it just smells like a coverup to me.”

Even the bikers said the bikers did it!


16 posted on 08/21/2015 9:01:33 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“Maybe the bikers did it”

The parent Confederation of the Texas Confederation that hosted the ‘meeting’ said that the Cossacks started it.


17 posted on 08/21/2015 9:02:30 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chode
-- so this is an admission there was no probable cause for the others? --

No. Preliminary hearings are only conducted on demand of an accused, so the outcome of any given examining trial only affects the parties in that particular examining trial.

Most of the accused, seeing that the judge finds probable cause when none exists, and given the option of "examining trial or have your bail conditions relaxed," opt for relaxation of bail conditions.

18 posted on 08/22/2015 2:27:02 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

This case was an appeal from a hearing on a writ of habeas corpus, held in the 54th District Court. It was not an examining trial, so my previous remarks that said so were wrong.

The opinion is available from the tenth court of appeals website Case 10-15-00218-CR. One of the three judges dissented from the opinion (Chief Justice Gray), but no written dissent was or will be prepared.

The nub of the decision is contained in the following paragraphs from the opinion (225kb PDF):

Plainly, the affidavit does not allege that Pilkington or Weathers committed one of the underlying offenses of capital murder, murder, or aggravated assault, one of the two means of committing the second main element. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. 71.02(a)(1) ("the person commits or conspires to commit one or more of the following"). Thus, we turn to each appellant's specific complaint that the affidavit does not allege an agreement; i.e., that he conspired to commit one of the underlying offenses--that he agreed "with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that would constitute the offense ... ." Id. 71.01(b). The statute specifically states that the "agreement constituting conspiring to commit may be inferred from the acts of the parties." Id. And in reviewing the affidavit, the magistrate was permitted to draw reasonable inferences from the facts in the affidavit. We conclude that the magistrate could have reasonably inferred from the profusion of weapons at the scene and the subsequent violence that Pilkington and Weathers, as members of a criminal street gang, each agreed "with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that would constitute the offense" of capital murder, murder, or aggravated assault.

Lastly, we address each appellant's specific complaint that the affidavit does not allege that each of them performed "an overt act in pursuance of the agreement." Id. At the hearings, the State argued that, on the day in question, Pilkington and Weathers committed overt acts by showing up at the restaurant--by being present and wearing their distinctive signs or symbols identifying each of them as a member of a criminal street gang, along with other members of a criminal street gang. As noted above, the overt act need not be criminal in itself. See Barrera, 321 S.W.3d at 154. The magistrate could have reasonably inferred that their presence and wearing their distinctive signs or symbols identifying each of them as a member of a criminal street gang was an overt act. The magistrate also could have reasonably inferred from their presence, from their wearing their distinctive signs or symbols, and from the profusion of weapons at the scene and the subsequent violence that each of them performed an overt act by either encouraging, soliciting, directing, aiding, or attempting to aid the commission of the underlying offenses of capital murder, murder, or aggravated assault. See id.

In conclusion, by applying the highly deferential standard in reviewing the magistrate's decision to issue the arrest warrant based on the four corners of the affidavit, we find that the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed to believe that Pilkington and Weathers committed the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity.


19 posted on 08/22/2015 5:20:18 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

“Pilkington and Weathers committed the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity.”

Re: overt act:
Weathers said as much in his bond reduction hearing — that he ran over as soon as the Bandido President was “disrespected” and joined in the fisticuffs.


20 posted on 08/22/2015 5:29:50 AM PDT by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson