Isn’t destruction of evidence a felony?
Sure....assuming that's the original HD in the unit. Bet it's not.
What company and specific person(s) wiped the server clean?
Did this company and or person have security clearances to wipe the server?
On who’s instructions wwas the server wiped?
If we see dead bodies turned up with mysterious causes, then we know Camp Hillary is doing mop up operation.
Simply wipe HER private server is not that smart.
Wasn’t it getting dusty, and in need of a good wiping?
Well of course she did — how else could she prove there was nothing incriminating on there?
Did he say if it was wiped with a cloth???
I still can’t get over Hillary making snarky comments about wiping the server with a cloth. There are serious legal.and national security issues involved here, and her response is snark. This from the smartest woman in the world.
It probably went down like this. The lawyer read some emails and said, “Okay, this is evidence of about 50 prosecutable crimes. We’ll erase the evidence and, even though that’s a crime its a much lessor crime than these emails indicate. We’ll then be able to claim you never committed a crime and the only reason this erasure is an issue is because the evil Republicans are attacking you politically. We’ll call out the AstroTurf to riot on your behalf and this will eventually go away.”
They are trying to say, “It was wiped clean for legally virtuous reasons. WE gave you everything relevant.”
Obviously, that means they hid what they thought was damaging. I’ve been in some civil litigation where games were played, but they were nothing compared to the bald in-your-face BS the Clinton camp puts out and the stiff-arming of the Court and Congress they engage in.
Well where are all those emails coming from then????
Do you talking heads really think the people are that stupid or do you think your that stupid that we would even begin to believe you????
Law firm representing Hillary has ties to State Dept.
By SARAH WESTWOOD 8/19/15
An attorney who worked for the same firm representing Hillary Clinton in the legal battle over her private emails now oversees the State Departments handling of those same emails.
Catherine Duval, formerly of Williams & Connolly, departed the Internal Revenue Service last year for the State Department, where she assumed responsibility for the release of Clintons emails and for the agencys production of documents to the House Select Committee on Benghazi.
Rep. Jim Jordan, a member of both the select committee and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said he sees similarities between the IRS investigation and the Benghazi investigation.
Its interesting that Kate Duval was at Williams & Connolly, and then went to the IRS, and when she was at the IRS, she was the chief counsel when the 422 backup tapes were destroyed, Jordan told the Washington Examiner, referring to Duvals involvement in an investigation into IRS targeting of conservatives.
They figure destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice are much milder crimes than selling national classified information to our country’s enemies.
Rose Mary Woods’ fault!!
She inspired an unnamed (but living) peon to step on a pedal by mistake, and next thing you know, the one and only private property with government data SOS hard drive with no backup was wiped clean with 10000 gauss!!
No credibility gap here!!
It appears that nobody seems interested it the question of WHEN the server was scrubbed. It could be:
The day before the FBI picked it up.
While Hillary was still Secretary of State.
Anytime in between.
The lack of curiosity relative to the timing of the scrub and the question of WHO ordered it is simply amazing. Nether subject ever seems to come up in the reporting.
David Kendall, John Podesta and James Carville, all out in the media spinning the latest Clinton scandal and stonewalling criminal investigations of the Clintons. It almost makes me feel like I’m back in the 90s . . . . only we are about $10 trillion more in debt.
You have to hand it to the Clintons they have every base covered,you ain’t going to touch them
18 U.S. Code § 1519 -— Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
Why do we keep hearing the same thing over and over again? People act as if each time this is reported, it’s new news! It’s been reported over and over and how many times are people going to comment on it?