Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

She actually says the word no but with the Clinton’s does she mean no regarding with a cloth?

Also she’s admitting she deleted thousands of emails. It’s the same old Clinton misdirection about how she turned over 50,000 emails and oh yeah she deleted what she wanted that’s the law.

And after that it really was a “what difference does it make”argument because she’s saying she would have had the right to delete personal emails even if they were on the government server.

Of course a government server wouldn’t have been wiped clean, noyt would it have been a security risk.

Take away for most people is she looks and sounds like a guilty liar.


23 posted on 08/18/2015 5:26:11 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Williams
Of course a government server wouldn’t have been wiped clean, noyt would it have been a security risk.

Umm....there are numerous recent stories which illustrate just how secure the government computing infrastructure is.

62 posted on 08/18/2015 6:04:04 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (The only fiscally sound thing dems ever did: create a state run media they don't have to pay for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Williams
Can you repeat what she said or meant? please.

I'm sure it will have a different meaning each time. lol

66 posted on 08/18/2015 6:12:11 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson