I was in CA when she ran here. her record is actually horrible.
Her platform should include free inkjet ink for all.
although i think sorkin leans left, hard to argue with his analysis here. HPQ was not in better shape when fiorina left than when she started. that’s the bottom line. also, i don’t think it DQ’s her
“Carly Fiorinas Business Record: Not So Sterling”
Well I’m pretty F’n sure that when Carly Fiorina left HP U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty were all still alive — So, two female candidates running for president, who do you trust with the lives of Americans?
And of course, Fiorina is equal to each of those people. /s
Sigh. I will say it again. The stock dropped based on analysts' buy/sell/hold recommendations. The same analysts she basically told their opinions and "quarterly expectations" were irrelevant to the success of the company.
The golden boys/girls of Wall Street who get paid enormous salaries for having good track records for predicting company performance are the ones declaring if meeting their expectations are important or not.
I know her track record at HP wasn’t great but her worst days at HP were still a hundred times better than Hillary’s best days at the State Department.
I wish the New York Times would show as much incredulity when the Obama administration touts its economic accomplishments.
.
Since when is business acumen a necessity for a POTUS?
Judging from the last two elections, there are no standards or expectations or demonstrated skills required.
HA! Says the NYTimes, which has been steadily declining in value and influence since coming out as a mouthpiece of leftism.
So what does Obama’s or Hillary’s business record look like?