--surprised the J-S let this slip in---
To: rellimpank
Think about that for a second. Just because these private citizens hold certain political beliefs, they were identified, harassed and intimidated. This is precisely what government reporting laws would enable. As these examples illustrate, it has nothing to do with transparency and everything to do with silencing opponents.America voted for "hope and change". One change we received was the open use of government as a progressive tool against political opponents.
To: rellimpank
“John Doe” may be over for the citizens, (Are we so sure that no other citizens are still under gag order?) the prosecution of those instigated “John Doe” (Chrisholms and those nameless judges he relied on) should be front and center news 24/7.
As for the government want names for donation to NGOs will result in government absorbing NGOs eventually. (Their path to Single Payer similarly.) Think about it for a sec.
3 posted on
08/18/2015 4:36:14 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: rellimpank
Where was Walker while all this was happening?
4 posted on
08/18/2015 5:21:14 AM PDT by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson