Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Clinton email count: 305 documents with potentially classified information
Washington Times ^ | August 17, 2015 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 08/17/2015 9:52:38 AM PDT by maggief

More than 300 of former Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton’s emails — or 5.1 percent of those processed so far — have been flagged for potential secret information, the State Department reported to a federal court Monday.

(snip)

The reviewers have screened about 20 percent of the 30,000 emails Mrs. Clinton returned to the department, which means if the rate of potentially secret information remains steady, more than 1,500 messages will have to be sent to intelligence community agencies, known in government as “IC,” to screen out classified information.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: classifiedemails; coverup; email; emails; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemails
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: maggief

Now she is apparently claiming (nuancing/parsing) “I” didn’t get any emails ‘marked’ classified.

Recall some recent news about someone removing the classification identification from some emails.

Wonder who will be identified as the evil rat(s) who removed the classification identification and take the fall?

Then that brings up the question: Why would anyone remove the classification identification from any email or attachment? That would be as ridiculous as someone being tasked with going through each email and deleting the word “Madam” from them.


41 posted on 08/17/2015 10:45:32 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Some Googling on 119 W Chicago Ave:

==

https://www.redfin.com/IL/Westmont/119-W-Chicago-Ave-60559/home/18025272

Above real estate site indicates property at 119 W Chicago Ave is a house in Westmont, IL 60559. This 1,492 square foot house features 3 bathrooms.

Property was last sold in 2006. It has been listed and delisted a couple of times in 2015.

==

http://www.spokeo.com/IL/Westmont/119-W-Chicago-Ave

shows 18 residents are associated with 119 W Chicago Avenue. Walsh family (3 people), 1 female Wright, Dorsett 2 people, Getz 4 people. Additional last names are listed in the dropdown (Johnson, Martin, Saunders, Schab, Stevens)

The above may have resided at the address at different times and not concurrently. The website does not list residency dates.

No one named Clinton is shown on this Spokeo website for the 119 W Chicago Ave, Westmont, IL address.

==

http://app01.locallabs.com:8002/property/09-09-202-022/119_w_chicago

The above shows that the house was built in 2007. Current owners are Scot and Diane* Stevens.

It seems that Stevens bought house from Walsh in 2006. Walsh acquired the property in 2004.

[*perhaps Diane’s maiden name was Clinton]


42 posted on 08/17/2015 11:08:42 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maggief
This crosses the threshold from "inadvertent" to a malicious bypass of all security protocols and procedures.

I wonder if Hillary is aware that the FBI is tapping into every communication she undertakes? Phone, email, chat,...even 1/2 the people around her are probably wearing wires.

Her, and all her closest associates.

43 posted on 08/17/2015 11:19:27 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Thanks!


44 posted on 08/17/2015 11:25:03 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The Queen of America is a criminal. Jail for life without possibility of Botox.


45 posted on 08/17/2015 11:42:42 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

bump


46 posted on 08/17/2015 11:58:28 AM PDT by GOPJ (Research facilities aren't using two million pounds of dead babies a year. Who's got the rest ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
That actually brought tears to my eyes.

Just the thought that such a senior member of the Administration could care so little about her country.

47 posted on 08/17/2015 12:02:18 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

48 posted on 08/17/2015 12:08:27 PM PDT by Company Man (~Hillary for Prison 2016~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301

If this domain had any connection to Hillary it would not be listed on whois.


49 posted on 08/17/2015 12:22:08 PM PDT by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

I understand that is is very serious. Big time serious. So I understand how bad this situation is.

That said, is it not a little amusing to see this witch swing in the breeze a little bit. Isn’t a little joyous to see her try to “Clinton-speak” her way out of this. isn’t it fun to watch Obama pretty much wash his hands of her?


50 posted on 08/17/2015 12:22:24 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

No, you have to understand Clinton Speak.

She said she neither sent or received emails that were “marked” classified.

Of course, before whomever sent them to her, removed the classified markings. They are in deep crap. But of course, whoever that is, they will roll on Hitlery pretty fast—telling the FBI they were instructed to do so by the Queen herself. I will bet the Queen said, “Its OK, I will take care of it.”


51 posted on 08/17/2015 12:26:10 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
If this domain had any connection to Hillary it would not be listed on whois.

Good point. Other posters have provided additional data which makes it look coincidental.

52 posted on 08/17/2015 12:29:33 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: maggief
1) Hillary Clinton ===> United States Penitentiary, Administrative Maximum Facility Florence CO.

2) How many OTHER highly placed 0bama regime officials have been illegally using private email servers and mishandling sensitive information thereon?

53 posted on 08/17/2015 12:32:41 PM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
How many classified documents are regular citizens allowed to have before being arrested?

Apparently 1.

Some animals are more equal than others.

54 posted on 08/17/2015 12:49:52 PM PDT by zeugma (Zaphod Beeblebrox for president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
There's now a thread with Rush Limbaugh asking that very same question. See, great minds--yours, Limbaugh's--think alike!

It Just Keeps Getting Worse for Hillary (snicker)

55 posted on 08/17/2015 12:54:21 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (As we say in the Air Force, "You know you're over the target when you start getting flak!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Heh ... that question came up over beers a couple of nights ago ...


56 posted on 08/17/2015 1:05:38 PM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

“How many classified documents are regular citizens allowed to have before being arrested?”

One shot, one kill.


57 posted on 08/17/2015 1:58:42 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

“IF NSA is actually tracking ‘internet’ data, they already have all Hillry’s emails.”

Rest assured, they are and they do.

But the NSA is buried so deep in its own world that Hillary’s emails hardly matter. They have several levels of security far above what Hillary, or Obama, are privy to, so this is pretty petty to them. The NSA is a whole different animal, and neither the CIA, Mossad, nor the KGB can be compared, because they are apples and oranges.

The NSA transcends national borders and politics, and they really don’t much care who is president. Do you think the one organization who actually has the fate of most of the world held in its decisions would entrust that kind of power to just any jerk who happens to bribe or extort his/her way into the presidency?

Hardly.


58 posted on 08/17/2015 2:19:36 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Receiving classified on an unauthorized computer and not reporting it is a problem too.

You and I know that, Hillary apparently doesn't. Let's pray that law enforecement does.

59 posted on 08/20/2015 11:42:59 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson