Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catsrus; sickoflibs
I disagree with you that a woman on the ticket will be a winning combination.

That isn't what I said though you could infer that. I do think having a woman to attack Hillary would be a positive. I think back to her first Senate debate, Rick Lazio was accused of "bulling" the poor dear. When women are on trial the prosecutors like to have a woman DA lead the charge.

What I said though was, female candidates WILL be considered. And I believe they will be. And it's only a matter of time I think before one will be elected.

The problem with this is - even though women are half of the nation - the majority won’t vote for another female candidate as president or vice president.

Well I won't pretend to know how your sex thinks or wants, lol. None of us do. ;)

I don’t think America is ready now or ever to turn the reins of the government over to a female. Is this sexist? Yes, it is, but, truth. And, I’m female, by the way.

I have some misgivings myself. Thatcher showed a woman could thrive, but she may be the exception that proved the rule.

32 posted on 08/09/2015 2:26:47 AM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

Don’t get me wrong. I like Carly in this race, if for no other reason than she can take it to Hillary the way a man can’t or won’t. No one can accuse the party of sexism that way. She serves a purpose and I hope she can survive for as long as possible.


34 posted on 08/09/2015 2:30:26 AM PDT by Catsrus (a and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson