Well, I can’t recall the last time a POTUS candidate dropped dead, or the last time a democrat grand poombah was indicted by a democrat DOJ, and she has no foe currently who can beat her (don’t say Sanders, I laugh, Biden maybe if he runs) so yes I assume and I’m fairly confident in my assumption.
But say she’s not on the ticket, fine. So what? All the more reason to put a woman on GOP ticket, as McCain did after she lost in 2008 and Obama picked Biden. Women are half the country and both parties would like to be first in getting one in P or VP, duh. So women WILL be considered just for the sake of their being women.
Really, this is a silly argument by you. The GOP nominee won’t be thinking “gee well Ferraro lost so I better pick a dude”. Come on man.
I don’t think that it was Sarah’s fault that McCain lost, as someone here (Not you Impy) implied it was.
I never thought that.
Carly did real good.
But this is snapshot in time.
The problem with this is - even though women are half of the nation - the majority won’t vote for another female candidate as president or vice president. With Sarah, the media did a number on her, and let’s get real - most women were jealous of her looks, brains and Todd. I disagree with you that a woman on the ticket will be a winning combination. I don’t think America is ready now or ever to turn the reins of the government over to a female. Is this sexist? Yes, it is, but, truth. And, I’m female, by the way.