Posted on 08/08/2015 7:45:55 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
Trump does not pretend to be classy. Megyn does and she’s not. She should be working side by side with dyke Rachel Madcow on MSNBC. Then they could both yuck it up about Trump and how he “disparages” women. Classic liberal nonsense and that is exactly what Fox has became, with their shameful pimping for Jeb Bush and their love affair with sodomite “marriage”. As a matter of fact they should merge with MSNBC.
>>Do you floss after regurgitating Faux RINO dung, or do you leave the little green chunks between your teeth?
Donald Trump apologized by clarifying what he meant to say. I am surprised a man such as yourself would support such a sniveling, spineless, pathetic excuse of a man for President. But, let’s face it, Attila the Hun isn’t in the race.
It is ironic that conservatives want to save the lives of babies that would grow up to vote against them.
I’ll bet they did not kill the baby. Terminating a pregnancy is not the same as abortion. The baby died of natural causes (unable to sustain life outside the womb). Had the mother died, the baby would have also died. I cant see some one letting the mother die to save the life of a baby that was going to die
Phooey.
‘Whore’ isn’t solely about sex. My mutt is a food whore.
MK intended to debase and humiliate Donald with her question.
She was going for the double bind. Nasty piece of work.
POIGNANT question??!!
She lost twins actually and when she got pregnant a second time the pregnacy was terminated again, then my daughter got cancer because of the pregnancy. That was 3 years ago. She gave birth to a healthy baby girl a month ago, albeit 5 weeks early. There is a lot more to it, but she had ground-breaking surgery where the doctors removed the part of her uterus and they weren't sure she'd be able to have children.
“
We are blessed. You go ahead and cling to whatever you think is “statistically” significant
Good point.
I think you confuse terms because you leave out intent. Intent is what divides killing from murder, unintentional homicide from murder in the first degree. If one considers the morality of self defense and just war; truly the intent is not to murder those that want to kill you but rather to defend yourself using the proportionate means necessary to assure you survive.
I can tell you that myself as a Catholic, the Catholic Church gas extensively elaborated upon and developed better than any others the moral landscape on this issue.
Abortion, simply put, is intentional murder. Reasons do not really matter when the intention is evil. In other words good ends never justify evil means.
Food Hound is the phrase not a food whore. look up whore in the dictionary - deals with prostitution. Gee doberville you are so smart, The bumper sticker on your car probably is I brake for squirrels!
>>Donald Trump apologized by clarifying what he meant to say.
Bullshyte.
“Trump Hits Back: Only a Deviant Would Think Anything Else (Trump Statement)”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3322199/posts
Mr tough guy, this is the tweet to which I referred:
Re Megyn Kelly quote: ‘you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever’ (NOSE).
Your quote is from Sunday. In real time (soon after he realized he had stepped on it), your man went limp. He apologized. The Donald apologized. Not that I follow him closely, but this is the first time I have heard him apologize. Then either he figured it out, or his advisors told him how to pivot on the question. That’s where you turn it around, and make your “answer” into an accusation. Of course, you knew this. You know that the Donald is jerking his supporters off with his braggadocio.
Just as a reminder, in my original post, I agreed with Trump that he was unfairly targeted by the panel. The Fox panel should have asked more policy-oriented questions and fewer personality-oriented questions of him. Even considering this, I thought it was the best pre-nomination debate in the history of the country, with the credit going to both Trump and to Fox. Even so, Trump’s comment during a post-debate interview went too far.
Baloney. That's your spin.
Did he apologize to Chris Wallace as well - after using the same colorful euphemism about him a minute or so after dismissing Megan? No.
Don't forget to floss those molars:
I didn’t realize the Donald said something about Chris Wallace that could be interpreted to mean Wallace was on the rag. That is indeed exactly the kind of man we need as President. Maybe you could be his Vice President.
>>I didnt realize the Donald said something about Chris Wallace that could be interpreted to mean Wallace was on the rag.
He used the same words.
“Blood coming out of his eyes”.
Maybe you and Ewick Erickson shouldn’t project your mangina complex onto others.
Mangina? You should email that to Trump. I don’t know that he’s used that word.
LOL
>> I dont know that hes used that word.
He didn’t. I’m using it in reference to the self-evident condition presented by you and Ewick.
So, the Donald said about Chris Wallace, he had Blood coming out of his eyes, just as he said this about Megyn Kelly. Nobody objected to the Donald saying this about either person.
The Donald also said about Megyn Kelly, “Blood coming out of wherever.” Which could be interpreted to refer to the female equivalent of a Mangina. This is what people objected to. The Donald apologized in a tweet, by clarifying what he meant. He said in the tweet, “Blood coming out of wherever.” (NOSE)
Do I have this correct, or did the Donald also say Chris Wallace has “blood coming out of his wherever.” (MANGINA)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.