But if you work for a living, obey the laws, are respectful and are anything but the above, then you not fine...
Nice country we live in nowadays....our fore fathers are turning over in their graves....
Utility bills, bank statements, or paychecks do not indicate citizenship or eligibility to vote.
“Disparate impact” is a flawed idea being used to illegally coerce behavior.
I know for a fact that Costa Rica, a nation with lots of really poor people, requires a government-issued photo voters card to vote. It does require that the citizen go to an office to apply for it. Somehow, the elderly, poor, minorities, and women manage to cope with this requirementbut U.S. citizens can’t?
SB 14 (select text tab and then select preferred file format under Bill)
From what I have seen so far, the Court has also failed to clearly make its point as to why SB 14 is a violation of Section 2 of Voting Act. Since each line in SB 14 is numbered, Court needs to clarify problem lines with specific sections of Voting Act.
“Slightly unconstitutional” is like being “slightly pregnant”. You either are or you’re not. So if it’s an easy fix then fix it and pass it again.
“Court says Texas Voter ID law is only slightly unconstitutional”
Similar to being slightly pregnant or slightly dead?
Since when is a Federal law the Constitution? How can a state law be “unconstitutional” in partially violating a federal law, when the States have authority unless specifically contrary to the Constitution?
Here is a list of the acceptable forms of photo ID:
Texas driver license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS)
Texas Election Identification Certificate issued by DPS
Texas personal identification card issued by DPS
Texas concealed handgun license issued by DPS
United States military identification card containing the persons photograph
United States citizenship certificate containing the persons photograph
United States passport
http://www.votetexas.gov/register-to-vote/need-id/
And 0bamacare and everything else this administration does is NOT “unintentionally unconstitutional”?