To: BigEdLB
I don't buy any head to head match ups yet. The las two cycles McCain and Romney were either ahead or very close at this point. Meaningless til nominee is set.
That said, don't fall (as I admittedly did in the past) for the notions of "weighting". Most polls are pretty accurate, as we found---twice.
7 posted on
08/05/2015 10:49:45 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: LS
Well, Hillary in the mid 40s, R's within 5 or less (Including Trump) and high undecideds is not a good sign for her in BLUE Minnesota. Plus - The sample is pretty close. Point well taken about the weights. Oversample of 3D is margin of error stuff. It is when, like some of the national polls (I think CNN) I have seen where you have a +10 D sample (Nationally) that I wonder about...
16 posted on
08/05/2015 11:17:16 AM PDT by
BigEdLB
(They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson