Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should we take Trump seriously?
The Delaware Gazette ^ | August 4, 2015 | Gary Abernathy

Posted on 08/03/2015 11:13:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Is Donald Trump the real deal, or will his presidential quest end up more like that of Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan?

My guess is that by the end of the day, The Donald will be a footnote in the 2016 presidential race, done in by his own hubris or some long-buried scandal that you know the national media is working furiously to uncover (or invent).

But until that day comes, he certainly is entertaining, and in many ways even refreshing.

The refreshing part about Trump is his completely unscripted answers to reporters’ questions. In the business of politics, the responses given by most candidates are poll-tested to the point of blandness. The rule they follow is like the Hippocratic Oath followed by doctors – first, do no harm.

Trump, on the other hand, is harm waiting to happen. He says Saudi Arabia “without us” is gone. He says Mexican border crossers are killers and rapists. He says John McCain is not a war hero.

McCain not a war hero? How dare he breathe such heresy? Why, even McCain’s harshest political opponents acknowledge his sacrifice and bravery as a prisoner of war.

Not Trump. Oh, he attempted to back off slightly from his criticism, but his comment, “I like people who weren’t captured” is what lingers. The only reason there wasn’t more blowback is that McCain has never been a particular favorite of Republicans, or especially conservatives, despite being the last man standing after the bruising 2008 GOP primary.

Conservatives have never trusted McCain and have viewed him as a limelight seeker who never hesitated to change his position or buck his own party if doing so helped make him a media darling. So the voters that matter most to Trump right now – conservatives – largely gave him a pass on his McCain comments.

Many conservatives are also willing, so far, to give Trump a pass despite the fact that over the years his political allegiances have waffled. He has donated both to Republicans and Democratic candidates, but the fact is that most smart business people contribute to both parties on a regular basis, regardless of their own personal philosophies. Policies or particular votes that help their bottom lines can come from either party.

Running for president of the United States is the next logical step in the progression of Trump’s ego-driven life. Do not take “ego-driven” as a particular criticism. Everyone running for president is ego-driven. It takes a special combination of confidence, arrogance and ego to believe that you, out of 320 million Americans, are uniquely qualified to be president.

No slouch in the ego department is Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who first decided 15 years ago that he wanted to be president, until the reality of no name identification and no funding led him to reluctantly drop out before the first straw poll in Iowa. His run for the Oval Office this time is a little more reasonable, and in fact he would probably be a good president.

Donald Trump took over a real estate business founded by his father and continued to grow it, not only building his own edifices but also renting out his name for other structures. He wrote a bestseller in 1987 called “The Art of the Deal,” then went bankrupt, then came back, then wrote more books, including “The Art of the Comeback.”

Craving more attention, he signed on to host “The Apprentice,’ a television show which saw contestants vie to run one of Trump’s companies, and made Trump’s “you’re fired” a catchphrase that he tried to trademark. In recent years, the show morphed into “Celebrity Apprentice,” naturally.

On Thursday night, the first formal debate, televised by Fox News, will be held among viable candidates for the GOP nomination, viability determined by the top 10 candidates in a combination of national polls. Trump is at the top of the field in many polls, and will be on stage for the main event. (He said he was skipping a Monday night lower-key Iowa forum airing on C-SPAN.)

Depending on how much time he is allotted among the other contenders, Trump should shine at the debate. Debates with multiple participants do not lend themselves to a requirement that contestants – er, candidates – necessarily answer the questions that are asked.

Trump is adept at deflecting questions that he may not be comfortable answering in-depth, and he can instead steer quickly into more familiar territory without anyone having the time necessary to demand more from him.

But his involvement is certainly entertaining, and for me that is a major bonus. It’s always fun to watch someone enter the political fray who doesn’t have the typical political background, doesn’t play by the rules, seems to march to his own drummer and rattles the old guard and many in the media, not to mention all the entitled politicians who get mad because he’s even there. How dare he?

It is a fairly safe bet that The Donald will not last beyond a few more weeks. Trump’s trajectory seems too much like that of a comet, streaking fast, burning brightly, then quickly falling from view. The GOP nominee doing battle next fall with Hillary Clinton – and Hillary will be the Democratic nominee — is likely to be Jeb Bush, Scott Walker or Marco Rubio. Trump could always launch a third-party run, but such candidacies always end up as losing sideshows.

But as in sports, there’s a reason they play the game, no matter what the odds are going in. Upsets happen, although they happen a lot more often in sports than in politics, where the spotlight tends to weed the substantive from the blowhards over time.

Trump will be fun to watch in the short term because he is such an entertaining blowhard, which is enough to keep him sailing for now. Whether he is around for us to watch when next year rolls around depends on whether there’s any substance behind the sails.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; polls; rubio; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
What is it with this Jeb Bush or Rubio nonsense? Do you know anyone who would walk through a hailstorm to vote for either one of them? I would do so to vote for Ted Cruz and I'm sure there are Walker and Trump followers here who'd do the same for their candidate. But John Ellis Bush? Marco Rubio?
1 posted on 08/03/2015 11:13:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Who cares if they do?


2 posted on 08/03/2015 11:20:49 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
%Trump is adept at deflecting questions that he may not be comfortable answering in-depth, and he can instead steer quickly into more familiar territory without anyone having the time necessary to demand more from him.

Cleary the author hasn't bothered to watch any of Trump's long interviews on Fox or the other networks. He doesn't seem to have any problem dealing with them them. In fact 99% of the politicians out there could take lessons from him.

3 posted on 08/03/2015 11:21:47 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
My guess is that by the end of the day...

Another stupid saying - "at the end of the day".
At the end of what day? Today? Tomorrow?

4 posted on 08/03/2015 11:26:47 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Should we take Trump seriously?


Trump is “IN” the game..

The only question is, is he playing a game.. -OR-
or actually out hunting bear..

He might have learned to do what Obama does...
Say what ever you want..... once elected do whatever the hell you want.. like most of them DO...

Tell the rubes what ever they want to hear... but do as you please..
MILK the federal goat.. after all “their goats”..

Like the CLintoon’s, Obama most of Congress have been doing for many decades..
AND be advised they have parasites.. fully as rapacious as any TICK.. or intestinal worm..

Trump “serious”... probably not.. that would be Cruz..


5 posted on 08/03/2015 11:26:51 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So, your hit piece is to tear down Trump supporters with the hopes that he drops out, endorses Cruz and then Cruz sails to victory? You truly are living in a dream world, aren’t you? This type of tactic is so juvenile. Opinions are like butt holes, everyone has one.


6 posted on 08/03/2015 11:30:21 PM PDT by Catsrus (a and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

7 posted on 08/03/2015 11:31:56 PM PDT by Bobalu (If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

So you think my name is Gary Abernathy, that I live in Delaware, write for a two-bit newspaper and then you didn’t read my comment at #1 addressing the author’s contentions? Did I miss anything?


8 posted on 08/03/2015 11:33:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m all in for Cruz, as you seem to be.

Cruz may need to ride the Trump train to get to the whitehouse. It may be a journey of several years though...but he’s a young man so it’s OK.

I get the feeling they have formed a team, I hope I’m correct.

Brains/Bucks 2016


9 posted on 08/03/2015 11:36:58 PM PDT by Bobalu (If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
The only question is, is he playing a game.. -OR- or actually out hunting bear..

With the poll numbers he's getting, he's loaded.

10 posted on 08/03/2015 11:37:03 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

What the heck, dude? 2ndDV has constantly defended Trump, IIRC. Besides, it’s not like he wrote this piece. Pretty sure he posted it so we could all read and comment on it just like any other article. You need to chill out. Not all articles that users post on this site reflect their personal views.


11 posted on 08/03/2015 11:38:02 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!"- Samuel Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No, but I did. I read the article hurriedly, and wrongly attributed it to you. For that, I apologize. So, I guess my scathing remarks should be directed toward Gary Abernathy?


12 posted on 08/03/2015 11:38:57 PM PDT by Catsrus (a and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

I guess. Go look at his photo.


13 posted on 08/03/2015 11:39:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You have been found out and your insidious plot has failed. :P


14 posted on 08/03/2015 11:40:03 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!"- Samuel Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

First of all, I’m NOT a DUDE, and secondly, read post #12.


15 posted on 08/03/2015 11:40:08 PM PDT by Catsrus (a and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Darn those meddling kids...


16 posted on 08/03/2015 11:40:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

I’m a Californian. All people are dudes regardless of sex. That’s just how the term has evolved. Especially in my generation. Your post is duly noted.


17 posted on 08/03/2015 11:42:27 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!"- Samuel Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
I’m all in for Cruz, as you seem to be.

Cruz is way more hopeless than anybody imagines Trump to be. He's an ideologue. Who can even plumb the machinations of his mind? Not me! Not the voters!

18 posted on 08/03/2015 11:42:58 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I made a mistake, and please forgive me for having macular degeneration in my left eye. It causes me problems at times. There is no need to make fun.


19 posted on 08/03/2015 11:43:10 PM PDT by Catsrus (a and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

I have vision problems, as well, and I was not trying to make fun, only quipping a joke from the old Scooby Doo cartoons. Remember?


20 posted on 08/03/2015 11:44:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson