Posted on 08/02/2015 3:59:19 PM PDT by South40
Poll: Who would make a better president, Hillary or Joe?
I know, there is no "Either one" option. But currently it's not looking good for the Beast.
(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...
Anybody but Obama would be a better president.
Joe’s not as venal and vicious, nor as competent, as Hitlery. He’s just a blabbering idiot. So Joe.
The people elected a muslim twice. They’ll definitely vote for a brain damaged Joe Biden because they know he really is one of them.
Lol.
Her heinous will be upset.
Expect Bidens medical records to be leaked.
People forget Joe was Harry Reid before there was Harry Reid.
Despite the veneer of idiocy, he was actually a vicious political operative.
It’s a trick question. (ala My Cousin Vinny)
The one with a vagina of course.
Who is “Joe”?
After his anyuerism surgery, I’m not certain Biden doesn’t have one or at least thinks to himself that he does.
Saul Alinsky.
Why vote for the lesser evil? Give the DUmasses what they want.
Joe McCarthy, no doubt about it.
The star of the morning gnus, joe biden.
He put out a floater about a possible presidential run.
Senator Biden was the first questioner. Instead of the softball questions he’d promised to ask, he threw a beanball straight at my head, quoting from a speech I’d given four years earlier at the Pacific Legal Foundation and challenging me to defend what I’d said. ”I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo, who defend an activist Supreme Court that would strike down laws restricting property rights.” That caught me off guard, and I had no recollection of making so atypical a statement, which shook me up even more. “Now, it would seem to me what you were talking about,” Senator Biden went on to say, “is you find it attractive the fact that they are activists and they would like to strike down existing laws that impact on restricting the use of property rights, because you know, that is what they write about.”pp 235-236 of "My Grandfather's Son" by Clarence Thomas #147;it has been some time since I have read Professor MacedoSince I didn’t remember making the statement in the first place, I didn’t know how to respond to it. All I could say in reply was that “it has been some time since I have read Professor Macedo … But I don’t believe that in my writings I have indicated that we should have an activist Supreme Court.” It was, I knew, a weak answer. Fortunately, though, the young lawyers who had helped prepare me for the hearing had loaded all of my speeches into a computer and at the first break in the proceedings they looked this one up. The senator, they found, had wrenched my words out of context. I looked at the text and saw that the passage he’d read out loud had been immediately followed by two other sentences: “But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy.” The point I’d been making was the opposite of the one that Senator Biden claimed I had made.
The least stupid of the Obama Administration. You know, the one who is not a muslime?
Slow Joe wants to get courted with meals and trips and applauding crowds too.
Interesting post, thanks
There is no good answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.