Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/02/2015 12:38:55 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: WilliamIII

Defeat for culture...

What a lie.

What they are afraid of, is that developers will get to keep their money, and the artists won’t be gifted with it instead.


2 posted on 08/02/2015 12:42:06 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Public Art, especially in affordable housing projects provides a venue for taggers to practice and perfect their own public art.


3 posted on 08/02/2015 12:44:41 PM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

If it ads value then the market would demand it.


4 posted on 08/02/2015 12:48:46 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Those places that have such ordinances are usually festooned with very mediocre art, but a number of artists who don’t need to work very hard.


5 posted on 08/02/2015 12:51:03 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

>>Artists in Oakland, meanwhile, are fearful that a victory for the firms will be a defeat for culture in a city which has seen an influx of artists in recent years, and damage its status.

If you need the government to force people (ultimately at gunpoint) to use your art, then your art is crap.


6 posted on 08/02/2015 12:56:29 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
California public art:

$500,000 taxpayer dollars to make a graven image of a murderous pagan god.

And it's ugly, too.

8 posted on 08/02/2015 1:26:05 PM PDT by null and void (If the government can't protect the Marines, how can we expect it to protect us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Artists who use canvas to display their art pay for it out of their own pockets.


9 posted on 08/02/2015 1:27:40 PM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

“Public art” should just be abolished


11 posted on 08/02/2015 1:38:00 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Oakland will have a Kim Jong-Un statue any day now


12 posted on 08/02/2015 1:38:43 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Don’t they just pass the costs on to the customer? Any fool that wants to build in these liberal fiefdoms deserves to pay through the nose.


13 posted on 08/02/2015 1:50:06 PM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
Public "art" is almost universally repellant.

Patrons of this creepy "art" typically justify the edginess or downright offensiveness of the pieces by saying that the purpose is to make people think, even if it makes them uncomfortable.

Of course, it's typically the lefty stuff that we are supposed to "think" about.

18 posted on 08/02/2015 2:01:24 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
A sample of Ms Poethig's 'art'

Johanna Poethig in Public Space

Imagine a bright-blue-eyed four-month-old baby girl traveling with missionaries to the Philippines. Picture her growing up and attending an alternative school in Manila filled with many friends who encourage her to engage in the vibrant art community. In her teenage years, she returns to the United States to learn as much about muralism as possible in Chicago, later venturing to the West Coast and settling in the Bay Area.....

-- snip --

19 posted on 08/02/2015 2:07:25 PM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Maybe those who believe ‘public art’ is valuable should start a fund. Then all those who believe as they do can contribute and make it happen without compelling people who do not to foot the bill.


22 posted on 08/02/2015 2:15:30 PM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Art that someone wants to pay for tends to be superior to art which they are forced to pay for .


27 posted on 08/02/2015 3:07:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

“Artists in Oakland, meanwhile, are fearful that a victory for the firms will be a defeat for culture in a city ...”

I doubt the culture of Oakland has anything to do with art unless one considers third world mob rule “art”.


29 posted on 08/02/2015 3:26:12 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (The cunning Venezuelan gov't has eliminated the toilet paper shortage by creating a food shortage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

I was in San Francisco last week. While walking the streets, I could only come up with one descriptive word-squalor. Obama’s third world hell hole transition will start in the cities and overwhelm the country. Besides sleeping, squatting and throwing trash wherever they please, America’s ‘entitlement class’ also demands the right to urinate and defecate in public. 19th century Calcutta also comes to mind.


31 posted on 08/02/2015 4:36:30 PM PDT by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson