Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Company Copes With Backlash Against the Raise That Roared
NY Times ^ | JULY 31, 2015 | PATRICIA COHEN

Posted on 08/01/2015 8:29:29 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

There are times when Dan Price feels as if he stumbled into the middle of the street with a flag and found himself at the head of a parade.

Three months ago, Mr. Price, 31, announced he was setting a new minimum salary of $70,000 at his Seattle credit card processing firm, Gravity Payments, and slashing his own million-dollar pay package to do it. He wasn’t thinking about the current political clamor over low wages or the growing gap between rich and poor, he said. He was just thinking of the 120 people who worked for him and, let’s be honest, a bit of free publicity. The idea struck him when a friend shared her worries about paying both her rent and student loans on a $40,000 salary. He realized a lot of his own employees earned that or less.

*

More troubling, a few customers, dismayed by what they viewed as a political statement, withdrew their business. Others, anticipating a fee increase also left. While dozens of new clients, inspired by Mr. Price’s announcement, were signing up, those accounts will not start paying off for at least another year. To handle the flood, he has already had to hire a dozen additional employees — now at a significantly higher cost — and is struggling to figure out whether more are needed without knowing for certain how long the bonanza will last.

Two of Mr. Price’s most valued employees quit, spurred in part by their view that it was unfair to double the pay of some new hires while the longest-serving staff members got small or no raises. Some friends and associates in Seattle’s close-knit entrepreneurial network were also piqued that Mr. Price’s action made them look stingy in front of their own employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: minimumwage

1 posted on 08/01/2015 8:29:29 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

It may have been easier for him to lower his own compensation and pay everyone a bonus, based in part on longevity.


2 posted on 08/01/2015 8:38:02 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

That escalated quickly.

lol.


3 posted on 08/01/2015 8:39:52 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

Obviously, that wasn’t a well-thought out plan


4 posted on 08/01/2015 8:40:20 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

He’s a bloody idiot.


5 posted on 08/01/2015 8:42:21 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

People assimilate into their own class warfare. Hey they got more raise than me, they cry!


6 posted on 08/01/2015 8:56:26 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobby_Taxpayer
“The great virtue of a free market system is that it does not care what color people are; it does not care what their religion is; it only cares whether they can produce something you want to buy. It is the most effective system we have discovered to enable people who hate one another to deal with one another and help one another.” - Milton Friedman

The guy stepped out of a free market system... and was justifiably considered 'unfair'...

7 posted on 08/01/2015 9:13:19 AM PDT by GOPJ (It takes a village of aborted dead babies to buy a Lamborghini - freeperblackdog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First; GeronL

Price pays the price.

There’s a book title in there somewhere...


8 posted on 08/01/2015 9:29:47 AM PDT by null and void (If the government can't protect the Marines, how can we expect it to protect us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

And now a rash decision based on emotion may bring dire consequences...didnn’t see that one coming.../s


9 posted on 08/01/2015 9:52:04 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Bump


10 posted on 08/01/2015 10:02:50 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Imagine you are working for a company for a number of year in which you have established yourself as a reliable, steady employee. You never bang in sick and you work extra hours and weekends when needed. Your efforts ensure that the company stays on track and meets deadlines, etc.

As a result, you move up in the ranks and earn for yourself a decent $70,000 salary.

Meanwhile, you are surrounded by slackers who habitually show up late or call in sick. They never go the extra mile. They gripe and complain and hold you in contempt because they see you as a brown-noser and a sucker. But you are okay with that because you are making almost double what they are making.

Then you come to work one morning and read the announcement. Everybody in the company is suddenly making the same as you. And unlike you, they didn't have to work for it. Suddenly all those who were taunting you are walking by you with smirks. They know that they are now at your level and that all your striving and dedication was all for nothing.

11 posted on 08/01/2015 10:14:21 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

The guy sure knows how to reward loyalty. /s


12 posted on 08/01/2015 10:16:00 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bobby_Taxpayer
Hey they got more raise than me, they cry!

And the “Good Book” - first put down about 2000 years ago in the towns around Jerusalem - also spoke of a parable where the workers complained about how much the workers in the vinyard made for people hired at day break, at midday, and in the afternoon.

But why did this "good socialist owner" not just pay the workers what they actually earned (what a strange concept so foreign to socialists!) so the best workers earned more money than the worst, and those not earning their wages actually got fired? What a concept!

13 posted on 08/01/2015 10:17:12 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“”While dozens of new clients, inspired by Mr. Price’s announcement, were signing up, those accounts will not start paying off for at least another year.””

Read the whole article and I still don’t know what benefits the new clients are expecting...They get to pay a fee to Mr. Price’s company like any other credit card processing company and then what?


14 posted on 08/01/2015 10:28:47 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

Lol

U failed to read article MM

Shamey shamey

He did lower his pay

Non meritorious egalitarian pay structure is a bad idea any time

Even properly done bonuses create issues even with good employees

I’ve been dealing with all this since 1975 when I determined Christmas bonus for my first crew at 18

I still don’t have a magic system

I listen to my wife’s good instincts about people at bonus time

I tend to think I can buy loyalty


15 posted on 08/01/2015 10:40:33 AM PDT by wardaddy (Mark Levin.....I love him...but he is ignorant of Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

His co-founder brother owns 30% of the company and is suing. Now the company can’t afford to buy him out, let alone pay more legal fees.


16 posted on 08/01/2015 11:43:23 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

They musta got lucky to be successful in the first place


17 posted on 08/01/2015 2:16:18 PM PDT by wardaddy (Mark Levin.....I love him...but he is ignorant of Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

pay everyone a bonus, based in part on longevity

Yes, much more effective. Many surveys are around that put pay at a lower importance in employee satisfaction.

Fairness, support, showing appreciation, training and business participation are much more important. Profit sharing or bonus is the way to go.

Scale salaries to market demand or, at the most, slightly above.


18 posted on 08/01/2015 3:06:09 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey (The larger the government, the smaller the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I recognize that place...


19 posted on 08/02/2015 12:33:42 AM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson