They used data from stations like these to buttress their contention that man-made warming is occurring, and the rest of their data is based on fraudulent, error-prone computer models and outright fabrications (look up "global warming hockey stick".
Anyone with an IQ above plant life knows that we’ve been consistently lied to on this issue. Just follow the $$, as Rush says, and you’ll find algore at the end of the rainbow.
Anyone with an IQ above plant life knows that we’ve been consistently lied to on this issue. Just follow the $$, as Rush says, and you’ll find algore at the end of the rainbow.
Actually what is exposed is that the high priests of science are master manipulators. They now have pappy Francis leading their crusade.
Keep in mind that most NOAA personnel are lifetime liberal bureaucrats, many of whom got their "jobs" through affirmative action, despite the fact that they were not necessarily the best candidate.
They used data from stations like these to buttress their contention that man-made warming is occurring, and the rest of their data is based on fraudulent, error-prone computer models and outright fabrications (look up "global warming hockey stick".
The cooling trend will be used to describe the success of the administration’s policies. They’re just not ready to launch the ads yet.
This is the warming war following the cold war.
None of those things will ever happen.
It's exactly the same as the false science of evolution.
OK? Liberals are pathological liars. They lie when the truth would suit them better. But, we’re shocked when we uncover their lies?
Also see:
unemployment data, inflation data, immigration data, public assistance data, homeless data, terrorism data, health cost data...
MANIPULATED GOVERNMENT LIES!
I have friends at NOAA who have entirely quaffed the cool aid. I show them articles like these and they start attacking the reputation of whistle blowers. I show them pictures of weather reporting stations in the middle of parking lots and attached to concrete buildings (which they are not supposed to even be near) and I am told that the pictures are either faked or not representative of the majority of stations. Their heads are so far up their butts they could lick their tonsils...
“The republican principle demands that the deliberate sense of the community should govern the conduct of those to whom they intrust the management of their affairs; but it does not require an unqualified complaisance to every sudden breeze of passion or to every transient impulse which the people may receive from the arts of men, who flatter their prejudices to betray their interests.” ― Alexander Hamilton
The natural disposition is always to believe. It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing.The man whom we believe is necessarily, in the things concerning which we believe him, our leader and director, and we look up to him with a certain degree of esteem and respect . . .
The desire of being believed, the desire of persuading, of leading and directing other people, seems to be one of the strongest of all our natural desires. - Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)
As bad as Hillary’s emails are, and the IRS spying on conservatives, and Fast and Furious, etc., there are a few people at NOAA that need to be put in jail for fabricating results if the GOP ever gets complete control of the federal government.
At a minimum, they should be returned to the private sector and replaced by real scientists.
Of course we have been cooling. Due to weaker solar activity. Just monitor ice in the Great Lakes and recent ice trends in Hudson Bay and the polar regions. Solar cooling is fact. The entire CO2 global warming theory is falsified. The insignificant amount of CO2 warming is supposed to become significant due to increased water vapor. In other words, they assume a thicker atmosphere will cause a higher average temperature. That is false. A thicker atmosphere causes smaller temperature extremes. The average stays the same. Just look at the planets in our solar system. All except mercury exhibit the following traits. Higher average temperature the closer they are to the sun. Regardless of the thickness of their atmospheres. And mercury may be an exception due to its proximity to the sun. So by lowering the thickness of the atmosphere, lowering CO2, they are actually increasing climate extremes in temperature.
