Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10
I was specifically referring to a "late term abortion." You have to be pretty sick to want to allow killing a baby almost ready to be born, on a woman's whim. Most women will acknowledge that they have mood swings; and that this option--whatever their views on earlier term abortions--is not justified.

Even if many today accept the sloganized "a woman's right to choose," the late term option is a loser if the Hillary opponent simply & calmly explains what is actually involved. Too many Conservatives lump all abortion issues together, and argue dogmatically--as opposed to persuasively. Also, almost no one actually analyzes exactly how the Left justifies abortion on whim, which has connotations that are not favorable to the justifier. (For example, see my comment on Al Gore's position in 2000, Right To Choose.)

32 posted on 07/22/2015 6:46:00 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan; All
"You have to be pretty sick to want to allow killing a baby almost ready to be born, on a woman's whim. "

Note that activist justices wrongly legislated the so-called right to abortion from the bench. They got away with doing so, sadly, because citizens do not understand that the only rights that the states are constitutionally obligated to respect are those rights which the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect. And activist justices wrongly ignored that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect abortion.

33 posted on 07/22/2015 9:50:43 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson