I have no interest in playing “how often do you beat your wife” loaded question logical fallacy games with you.
This is not a game. It is a fact. There are two fundamental, crucial issues/problems with your approach. I had assumed you were conversant with at least one of them, but chose to post the material anyway. I had speculated you might not be as cognizant of the second issue
And therein lies MY problem. I.e.: I rarely if ever fail to give Obama’s defenders more credit than they deserve.
I perceive you are entirely clueless after all. And that is just a shame. You have your little repertoire of items, you post them over and over and over, and you lack the analytical skills to ever, EVER grasp the fundamental problems with your approach.
Afaik there is no remedy for this. Obama’s defenders are just not astute when it comes to analyzing the weaknesses and shortcomings of their own positions. All they can truly grasp is that all Obama’s documents are the origin, authentic copies; Obama has never and would never lie about anything so fundamental as his birth, and so-called birthers are stupid. Anything beyond these three basic items, and they’re stumped.