Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Obama's Capitulation a Disastrous Win for Iranian Regime
Townhall.com ^ | July 15, 2015 | Guy Benson

Posted on 07/15/2015 10:41:43 AM PDT by Kaslin

The just-announced Iran deal confirms critics' worst fears: It hands an epic victory -- replete with twelve figures in sanctions relief -- to an outlaw, anti-American regime, it confers the West's blessing upon Iran's nuclear program, and it crosses numerous so-called "red lines" in doing so. The accord leaves Iran's vast nuclear infrastructure virtually entirely intact. Its restrictions automatically begin to phase out after a decade. It (almost immediately) pumps more than $100 billion into the regime's economy, providing Tehran with desperately-needed resources to step up its habitual terrorism abetment and toxic regional meddling. It eschews the sort of solid  anytime/anywhere snap inspections regime proponents of the deal promised repeatedly. It permits Iran to maintain its infamous underground nuclear facility -- long seen as an emblem of Iranian lawlessness and non-compliance. It allows Tehran to press forward with research and development on advanced-level centrifuges. Astonishingly, it caves to Iran's preposterous 11th-hour demands by accommodating the lifting of both the UN arms embargo and sanctions against the regime's illegal ballistic missile program -- issues that were allegedly off the table for Western negotiators. (Similarly, Iran's uniquely pernicious support for terrorism, ongoing illegal detainment of multiple US citizens, and genocidal hostility to Israel were also untouchable -- while apparently nothing was off-limits for Iran's delegation). It guarantees that even if Iran were to abandon its incurable habit of cheating and lying by fully complying with the agreement, the country would emerge as a threshold nuclear-armed state in just over a decade.  If and when Iran does cheat, the mechanisms for reinstating global sanctions are fraught with pitfalls.  This bell cannot be un-rung. It fails to significantly lengthen Iran's "breakout" horizon, according to experts, undermining Obama's last remaining fig leaf.  And it touches off an arms race in the world's most volatile and dangerous neighborhood. In short, it is disastrous for the United States and global security.

When the Obama administration claimed that no deal was preferable to a bad deal, they weren't telling the truth. Striking an accord, no matter how reckless and lopsided the terms, has been an obsession rooted in myopic naivety and selfish legacy-building.  At the onset of these negotiations -- brought on by tough sanctions that were opposed by Obama (again, instincts) -- the stated goal was to slowly diminish sanctions against Tehran, in exchange for the systematic dismantling of its nuclear program. This process would be overseen by comprehensively robust inspections, we were told. There would be no right to enrich. At the talks' conclusion, Iran achieves immense, front-heavy sanctions relief, in exchange for… promising to press a "pause" button on their nuclear program. The very same program that somehow increased its stockpile during the interim "halt," throughout which the Obama administration offered one excuse after another to paper over the regime's non-compliance.  Iran's president summarized the state of play rather bluntly this week: "The international community is removing the sanctions, and Iran is keeping its nuclear program." Here's Benjamin Netayahu torching the agreement as a "stunning historic mistake:"

PM Netanyahu's Statement Regarding the Deal with Iran

He's been right every step of the way on these matters, much to the Obama administration's petulant chagrin.  Congress will now review the details of the deal and vote up or down.  If they vote to disapprove of the deal, as expected, Obama has vowed to veto their disapproval, forcing Congress to muster two-thirds majorities to override him.  Large bipartisan majorities are likely to vote against the plan, but Democrats will likely furnish enough votes to sustain the presidential veto.  This dynamic exists because Obama refuses to submit this deal, which is intended to bind future Congresses and presidents, as a treaty.  Over the coming weeks, the White House will attack Republicans (in an effort to distract the media from the bipartisan nature of opposition), demand that people ignore how far the goalposts have shifted, and paint critics as warmongering zealots.  This White House takes a much tougher line with domestic critics than it does with fanatical theocrats who chant "death to America."  The grave consequences of this abject capitulation will likely take shape slowly, then explode in future years, long after Team Smart Power has receded from the scene.  Self-righteous, tendentious, demagogic self-congratulation today; someone else's problem tomorrow.  I'll leave you with this snide but frightening point, followed by Democrats throwing serious shade at the deal:

Don't worry, guys...President JV-squad-Red-Line McKeep-Your-Plan has GOT THIS. #IranDeal— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) July 14, 2015



TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; johnwhowasinnamkerry
More videos in the link
1 posted on 07/15/2015 10:41:43 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This dynamic exists because Obama refuses to submit this deal, which is intended to bind future Congresses and presidents, as a treaty.

If it's not a treaty, it doesn't bind future presidents.

2 posted on 07/15/2015 10:43:22 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama’s capitulation gives aid and comfort to the enemy.

And Congress still does......................................................nothing.


3 posted on 07/15/2015 10:44:26 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

He’s taking it to the U.N Security Council before he takes it to congress.
If approved at the U.N., it binds the heck out of everybody.


4 posted on 07/15/2015 10:49:07 AM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Fredo Smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama’s not stupid. He wanted them to win - he wanted us to lose. He wanted Israel to lose too.

Sometimes things are as they seem.


5 posted on 07/15/2015 10:51:40 AM PDT by GOPJ (Breaking into my house doesn't give you the right to stay... NO AMNESTY! (protest sign))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If this doesn’t get you to the limit on the ‘gag-o-meter’, you’re already dead.


6 posted on 07/15/2015 10:53:19 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

‘Sovereign’... I remember that word...


7 posted on 07/15/2015 10:57:00 AM PDT by polymuser ( Enough is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Are you listening to Obama’s press conference now on the deal?


8 posted on 07/15/2015 11:02:12 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Apparently he’s hired Harry Potter to work his magic on Iran to get inspectors in.


9 posted on 07/15/2015 11:11:21 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Those inspections..particular IEAA will also be allies of Iran.....yet Obama said we're overseeing every bit of this...no “WE” aren't....it's just like Korea...and no different then the guy who just got out of prison through tunnels...you have the money to pay and these inspectors will indeed look the other way.
10 posted on 07/15/2015 11:14:05 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I came to the realization this morning that the REAL problem in regard to the deal with Iran (or any other issue) is that our community organizer-in-chief has lost all credibility and it is impossible to believe him on anything.

That truly is a deep hole and unfortunate position into which to put one's self!

11 posted on 07/15/2015 11:19:18 AM PDT by jda ("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Old Sarge; EnigmaticAnomaly; Califreak; kalee; TWhiteBear; freeangel; ...

Analysis: Obama's Capitulation a Disastrous Win for Iranian Regime

When the Obama administration claimed that no deal was preferable to a bad deal, they weren't telling the truth.

Striking an accord, no matter how reckless and lopsided the terms, has been an obsession rooted in myopic naivety and selfish legacy-building.

At the onset of these negotiations -- brought on by tough sanctions that were opposed by Obama (again, instincts) -- the stated goal was to slowly diminish sanctions against Tehran, in exchange for the systematic dismantling of its nuclear program. This process would be overseen by comprehensively robust inspections, we were told. There would be no right to enrich. At the talks' conclusion, Iran achieves immense, front-heavy sanctions relief, in exchange for… promising to press a "pause" button on their nuclear program.

The very same program that somehow increased its stockpile during the interim "halt," throughout which the Obama administration offered one excuse after another to paper over the regime's non-compliance.

Iran's president summarized the state of play rather bluntly this week: "The international community is removing the sanctions, and Iran is keeping its nuclear program."

(snip)

Benjamin Netayahu's been right every step of the way on these matters, much to the Obama administration's petulant chagrin.

Check out article.

12 posted on 07/15/2015 11:24:22 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Iranians were insulting John Kerry right to his face, they stated they will kill all the Jews (millions of people) and destroy America. Every sane person is against this so what does the insane like obama and Kerry and those in Europe do? They give Iran everything. The republicans could stop this but they had to have been bribed months ago when they abandon the constitution.

War is coming and millions will die. The only upside I see is I am in California and I believe the wind blows to the east so I will not be affected by the radiation from the nuclear bombs going off in Washington and New York....


13 posted on 07/15/2015 11:25:37 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Your backyard is going to be crowded with people that glow in the dark!


14 posted on 07/15/2015 11:45:52 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I thought he said it was the best possible deal for the U.S. Maybe he could explain this in plain English.


15 posted on 07/15/2015 11:53:22 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It was not a capitulation. It was something Obama planned for a long time. Obama knows exactly what he is doing and why he is doing it. The idiots that alibi for him and say that he in in over his head may not know, but Obama does.


16 posted on 07/15/2015 12:00:49 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

>>>The only upside I see is I am in California and I believe the wind blows to the east so I will not be affected by the radiation from the nuclear bombs going off in Washington and New York....<<<

forgot the < sarcasm > tag


17 posted on 07/15/2015 12:31:43 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson