Posted on 07/13/2015 10:46:36 AM PDT by rey
And, lo and behold, it will be coming very soon to your neighborhood, in the form of a fair housing rule promulgated by Obama. This rule, known as the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule (AFFH), has been shrouded in secrecy.
Obama, the ultimate leftist, continues with his false utopian dreams. Repeatedly, Obama openly supports the notion that wealthy people have no right to their wealth. And, furthermore, it is the principled right of poor people – or the government serving their so-called interests – to rob the affluent of their hard-earned wealth. In traditional Obama fashion, the AFFH will actually promote racial division, racial rage, and social engineering, all the while maintaining an intention to undo racism.
What a clever way to insinuate certain people into a community who do not appreciate the culture of hard work yet thrive by maintaining a culture of entitlement mixed in with a rage that knows no bounds.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Endgame?? Read the Communist Manifesto.
Any questions???
If this does not wake up the Silent Majority, nothing will.
There was something like that YEARS ago. They’d find a vegetarian and put them with a hunter and his wife would go to the other house. It was a telling show. Libs vs. real people.
All about undoing the current GOP gerrymandering scheme. With this plus the SCOTUS ruling on independent commissions look for the Dems to achieve complete hegemony in a decade or so.
How about a ghetto Black family moving in next to Barbra Streisand in Malibu? I might even watch that!
Some day I’ll probably look back and thank Obama for prodding me enogh to get relocated to some tropical paradise where the only concern is the day’s catch.
I was thinking, this is an area where perhaps Free Republic could do something.
Each of us knows where the high-net-worth folks live in our neck of the woods.
If we could turn in reports about which neighborhoods - in our areas - are getting targeted for forced diversity, and which ones are not, we could perhaps put together a statistical case that the Regime is playing favorites, targeting certain neighborhoods and "exempting" others, where the "exempted" subdivisions are those in which prominent left-wingers and members of the MSM live.
I would be willing to act as a coordinator for this, if no one else wants to.
Barky’s end game is scorched earthing the U.S. and Israel.
You only live in a nice neighborhood because of your “white privilege” - it’s time to pay up for being a slave owner honky....
Yeah, I think a nice big low-income apartment complex, with three or four high-rise buildings, should be built right in the middle of that stretch of white-owned homes on the Malibu beach.
That would be my neighborhood, and I don't believe for a moment that Obama would offend his rich supporters, not in Phase 1 of social engineering our neighborhoods. Offending rich liberals will come in Phase 2, when they can be shamed into tolerating the damage done to everyone else and their neighborhoods.
"This doesn't make sense! Doesn't Obama realize that this policy will be bad for the country?"
or...
"This is Unconstitutional! Where in the Constitution does it say that he has the power to do this?"
or....
Copy and pasted Bible verses
Agreed. In addition, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, West Los Angeles, Encino, Tarzana all could use “integrated” neighborhoods.
What about areas on the North Shore of Long Island, where numerous entertainment and media figures live? Verrry very white communities on the North Shore.
What about Fairfield County, Connecticut?
What about Grosse Point, Michigan?
What about the area north of Chicago? Winnetka, Illinois could probably use a nice big dose of diversity.
Who has some ideas for other areas of this type? Let's try to put together a list. I'll keep it, and do statistics on it.
Even if all of the very poor black people were enraged, which I sincerely doubt, they only comprise a maximum of 25% of 13% of the population, about 3.25%. The whole race war fantasy is just that. The purpose of this law is to get your goat. You are being Alinski’d. . .but if that floats your boat. . .
Suppose Republicans said the only way to insure African Americans live in safe neighborhoods is to ensure that no African American can have a Black neighbor. Suppose they said African Americans make up about ten percent of the US population. Therefore no single square mile in the US can have a population of more than ten percent black.
This is Obama’s method, taken a small step further. It guarantees complete integration as well as safer neighborhoods for African Americans, if we believe inner city crime statistics. That’s all good, right? What could be wrong with it?
Oh, yes, in lots of places Democrats would never be elected again. But that is just a small downside to having racial equality and fairness, not to mention safety for the children.
Who could be against it?
I’m not familiar with Eastern neighborhoods.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.