IIRC California law precludes a person from suing the police for not enforcing the law.
But that’s not quite the same as suing a city for violating the law.
So would it be okay for a city to declare sanctuary for traditional marriage?
this week there has been a lot of ass covering specifically to thwart the machinations of plaintiff’s council when the discovery begins
Enter San Francisco At Your Own Risk
In Oregon Sanctuary counties came about ostensibly to protect them from suits by ILLEGALS for being held in jail without “cause” or too long
Donald Trump should’ve visited the family to offer condolences which would have assured him additional millions of voters.
Not very smart of him to ignore this opportunity.
Yep, expecially since SF ASKED the Feds to send him there where they hooked him up with some BLM guy’s gov’t gun.
Yes
Yes... in this day and age people sue cities all of the time when their offended, or feel disenfranchised.... yeah.. these people have had loss and damage every bit as much as others who sue have had. In reality MORE. I’d award them the money.
Maybe they could sue the Feds since it was their gun he used to kill their daughter.
Don't stop with the city of San Francisco, sue the mayor, police chief and council members each BY NAME. Last. but not least, sue the illegal alien usurper in the white hut BY NAME for failing to enforce the properly, and legally, enacted immigration laws and statutes.
In a just world, yes. In California?
Welcome to Acirema, where the guilty are rewarded and the innocent are punished. The half breed flaunts any and all laws and court rulings count for nothing. CO flaunts federal marijuana laws without consequences. SF and other sanctuary cities flaunt immigration law without consequences. What laws can I break without consequences?
BTW, any lawyer who would argue “It is commonly known that we have been a ‘sanctuary city’ for years. If this was a problem for the victim, she should have lived somewhere else.” deserves to be disbarred and committed to an institution for the criminally insane.
The court’s primary duty, lately, has been to protect the government from the people.
They can sue, of course, but who knows if they’ll prevail.
Better still can the city counsel members who voted in the sanctuary policy and the mayor who signed off on it be charged with murder too. They are most definitely compliant in this crime. And don’t leave out the DA.s and police chiefs either.